Ormat Technologies (ORA) vs Pampa Energia S.A. (PAM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Pampa Energia S.A. (PAM) has outperformed Ormat Technologies (ORA) over the past year, gaining 33.6% versus a loss of 14.2%. Over five years, PAM leads with a +309.4% price change compared with +26.1% for ORA. Ormat Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($5.53 billion vs $4.29 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Pampa Energia S.A. trades at a lower forward P/E (6.8x vs 35.3x for Ormat Technologies). Ormat Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.53%, while Pampa Energia S.A. does not currently pay one. Pampa Energia S.A. converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 33.0% versus 12.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ORA | PAM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $89.97 | $80.12 |
| Market cap | $5.53B | $4.29B |
| 1-day change | -3.33% | -1.67% |
| YTD return | -18.56% | -9.48% |
| 1-year return | -14.17% | +33.56% |
| 5-year return | +26.13% | +309.40% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 44.10 | 7.28 |
| Forward P/E | 35.26 | 6.83 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.04 | $11.00 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.48 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $989.54M | $1.88B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.49% | +8.31% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $123.90M | $619.00M |
| Gross margin | 27.56% | 31.82% |
| Operating margin | 17.10% | 23.45% |
| Net margin | 12.52% | 33.00% |
| 52-week high | $146.39 | $94.50 |
| 52-week low | $87.06 | $58.50 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -38.54% | -15.22% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +41.90% | +51.14% |
| Average volume | 853.49K | 172.57K |
| Shares outstanding | 61.50M | 53.60M |
| Employees | 1,648 | — |
| Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| Industry | Electric Utilities: Central | Electric Utilities: Central |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PAM has outperformed ORA by 47.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Ormat Technologies trades at a higher earnings multiple (44.1x vs 7.3x trailing P/E).
- Pampa Energia S.A. is more profitable, keeping 33.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 12.5 cents for Ormat Technologies.
About Ormat Technologies
ORA stock →Ormat Technologies, Inc. engages in the geothermal and recovered energy power business in the United States, Indonesia, Kenya, Turkey, Chile, Guatemala, Guadeloupe, New Zealand, Honduras, France, Indonesia, the Philippines, and internationally.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 1,648 employees
About Pampa Energia S.A.
PAM stock →Pampa Energía S.A. operates as an integrated power company in Argentina.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central
ORA vs PAM FAQ
Which is bigger, Ormat Technologies or Pampa Energia S.A.?
Ormat Technologies (ORA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.53B compared with $4.29B for Pampa Energia S.A. (PAM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ORA or PAM?
PAM returned +33.56% over the past 12 months, compared with -14.17% for ORA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ORA or PAM?
PAM has the lower trailing P/E at 7.3, versus 44.1 for ORA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Ormat Technologies or Pampa Energia S.A.?
Ormat Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.53%, while Pampa Energia S.A. does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Ormat Technologies and Pampa Energia S.A. in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electric Utilities: Central industry within the Utilities sector.