Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK) vs Polestar Automotive UK (PSNYW)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK) has outperformed Polestar Automotive UK (PSNYW) over the past year, losing 5.4% versus a loss of 33.7%. Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock is the larger company by market cap ($7.86 billion vs $686.7 million), about 11.4 times the size. Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock pays a dividend yielding 1.70%, while Polestar Automotive UK does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | OSK | PSNYW |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $127.35 | $4.18 |
| Market cap | $7.86B | $686.69M |
| 1-day change | -0.98% | +2.20% |
| YTD return | +1.37% | -34.38% |
| 1-year return | -5.37% | -33.65% |
| 5-year return | +25.27% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.59 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.05 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $8.73 | $-15.00 |
| Dividend yield | 1.70% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $2.16 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $10.42B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.87% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $647.00M | — |
| Gross margin | 17.45% | — |
| Operating margin | 9.01% | — |
| Net margin | 6.21% | — |
| 52-week high | $180.49 | $14.40 |
| 52-week low | $116.77 | $2.10 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -29.44% | -70.97% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +31.51% | — |
| Average volume | 711.65K | 306.31K |
| Shares outstanding | 61.74M | 164.28M |
| Employees | 18,000 | 1,686 |
| Sector | Industrials | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Auto Manufacturing | Auto Manufacturers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock is about 11.4 times larger than Polestar Automotive UK by market value ($7.86B vs $686.69M).
- OSK has outperformed PSNYW by 28.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.00%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock in Industrials and Polestar Automotive UK in Consumer Cyclical.
About Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock
OSK stock →Oshkosh Corporation provides purpose-built vehicles and equipment worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Access, Vocational, and Transport segment.
Industrials · Auto Manufacturing · 18,000 employees
About Polestar Automotive UK
PSNYW stock →Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC engages in the research and development, marketing, commercialization, and sale of battery electric vehicles in Europe, North America, the Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and internationally. The company offers battery electric vehicles, including Polestar 2 (PS2); Polestar 3 (PS3); Polestar 4 (PS4); Polestar 5 (PS5); and Polestar 6 (PS6), a roadster.
Consumer Cyclical · Auto Manufacturers · 1,686 employees
OSK vs PSNYW FAQ
Which is bigger, Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock or Polestar Automotive UK?
Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock (OSK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.86B compared with $686.69M for Polestar Automotive UK (PSNYW).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, OSK or PSNYW?
OSK returned -5.37% over the past 12 months, compared with -33.65% for PSNYW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock or Polestar Automotive UK?
Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock pays a dividend yielding 1.70%, while Polestar Automotive UK does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock and Polestar Automotive UK in the same industry?
No. Oshkosh (Holding)Common Stock is in the Industrials sector, while Polestar Automotive UK is in Consumer Cyclical.