Pembina Pipeline (PBA) vs Woodside Energy Group (WDS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Woodside Energy Group (WDS) has outperformed Pembina Pipeline (PBA) over the past year, gaining 49.7% versus a gain of 15.7%. Over five years, PBA leads with a +37.1% price change compared with +21.1% for WDS. On valuation, Woodside Energy Group trades at a lower forward P/E (11.9x vs 21.1x for Pembina Pipeline).
Pembina Pipeline offers the higher dividend yield (6.10% vs 5.14%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PBA | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $47.31 | $22.57 |
| Market cap | $27.51B | — |
| 1-day change | +0.34% | -0.09% |
| YTD return | +23.88% | +44.90% |
| 1-year return | +15.68% | +49.70% |
| 5-year return | +37.06% | +21.06% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 23.08 | 14.11 |
| Forward P/E | 21.07 | 11.89 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.05 | $1.60 |
| Dividend yield | 6.10% | 5.14% |
| Annual dividend | $2.89 | $1.16 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $12.98B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -1.48% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $2.72B |
| Gross margin | — | 34.94% |
| Operating margin | — | 29.95% |
| Net margin | — | 20.93% |
| 52-week high | $51.58 | $25.19 |
| 52-week low | $36.20 | $14.27 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -8.28% | -10.40% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | -1.27% | +8.68% |
| Average volume | 993.22K | 622.41K |
| Shares outstanding | 581.55M | — |
| Employees | 2,974 | 4,693 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WDS has outperformed PBA by 34.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Pembina Pipeline trades at a higher earnings multiple (23.1x vs 14.1x trailing P/E).
About Pembina Pipeline
PBA stock →Pembina Pipeline Corporation provides energy transportation and midstream services. It operates through three segments: Pipelines, Facilities, and Marketing & New Ventures.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 2,974 employees
About Woodside Energy Group
WDS stock →Woodside Energy Group Ltd engages in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing, and sale of hydrocarbons in the Asia Pacific, Africa, the Americas, and the Europe. It produces liquefied natural gas, pipeline gas, crude oil and condensate, and natural gas liquids.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 4,693 employees
PBA vs WDS FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PBA or WDS?
WDS returned +49.70% over the past 12 months, compared with +15.68% for PBA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PBA or WDS?
WDS has the lower trailing P/E at 14.1, versus 23.1 for PBA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Pembina Pipeline or Woodside Energy Group?
Pembina Pipeline has the higher yield at 6.10%, compared with 5.14% for Woodside Energy Group.
Are Pembina Pipeline and Woodside Energy Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.