Phillips Edison (PECO) vs Sabra Health Care REIT (SBRA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Phillips Edison (PECO) has outperformed Sabra Health Care REIT (SBRA) over the past year, gaining 11.0% versus a gain of 4.8%. Over five years, SBRA leads with a +23.9% price change compared with +19.0% for PECO. Phillips Edison is the larger company by market cap ($5.31 billion vs $4.83 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Sabra Health Care REIT is growing revenue faster (+10.2% vs +9.9%).
On valuation, Sabra Health Care REIT trades at a lower forward P/E (23.3x vs 53.5x for Phillips Edison). Sabra Health Care REIT offers the higher dividend yield (6.35% vs 3.43%). Sabra Health Care REIT converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 20.1% versus 15.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PECO | SBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $37.54 | $18.91 |
| Market cap | $5.31B | $4.83B |
| 1-day change | +0.40% | +0.35% |
| YTD return | +5.12% | -0.53% |
| 1-year return | +11.05% | +4.78% |
| 5-year return | +18.96% | +23.87% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 32.93 | 75.62 |
| Forward P/E | 53.53 | 23.34 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.14 | $0.25 |
| Dividend yield | 3.43% | 6.35% |
| Annual dividend | $1.29 | $1.20 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $726.59M | $774.63M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.86% | +10.15% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $111.30M | $155.61M |
| Net margin | 15.32% | 20.09% |
| 52-week high | $44.38 | $22.77 |
| 52-week low | $32.98 | $17.17 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.40% | -16.97% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +16.20% | +20.55% |
| Average volume | 963.60K | 2.63M |
| Shares outstanding | 128.70M | 255.46M |
| Employees | 320 | 58 |
| Sector | Real Estate | Real Estate |
| Industry | Real Estate Investment Trusts | Real Estate Investment Trusts |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Sabra Health Care REIT trades at a higher earnings multiple (75.6x vs 32.9x trailing P/E).
- Sabra Health Care REIT offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.35% vs 3.43%).
About Phillips Edison
PECO stock →Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is one of the nation's largest owners and operators of high-quality, grocery-anchored neighborhood shopping centers.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 320 employees
About Sabra Health Care REIT
SBRA stock →Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. operates as a self-administered, self-managed real estate investment trust that, through its subsidiaries, owns and invests in real estate serving the healthcare industry throughout the United States and Canada.
Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 58 employees
PECO vs SBRA FAQ
Which is bigger, Phillips Edison or Sabra Health Care REIT?
Phillips Edison (PECO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.31B compared with $4.83B for Sabra Health Care REIT (SBRA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PECO or SBRA?
PECO returned +11.05% over the past 12 months, compared with +4.78% for SBRA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PECO or SBRA?
PECO has the lower trailing P/E at 32.9, versus 75.6 for SBRA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Phillips Edison or Sabra Health Care REIT?
Sabra Health Care REIT has the higher yield at 6.35%, compared with 3.43% for Phillips Edison.
Are Phillips Edison and Sabra Health Care REIT in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.