MetaCap

Kite Realty Group (KRG) vs Phillips Edison (PECO)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Phillips Edison (PECO) has outperformed Kite Realty Group (KRG) over the past year, gaining 11.0% versus a gain of 8.0%. Over five years, PECO leads with a +17.9% price change compared with +10.2% for KRG. Phillips Edison is the larger company by market cap ($5.29 billion vs $4.94 billion), about 1.1 times the size.

On valuation, Phillips Edison trades at a lower forward P/E (55.1x vs 70.8x for Kite Realty Group). Kite Realty Group offers the higher dividend yield (4.73% vs 3.44%). Kite Realty Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 35.4% versus 15.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

KRG+7.42%PECO+10.99%
+37%+16%-5%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
KRG+11.07%PECO+18.83%
+44%+10%-24%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

KRG versus PECO key metrics
MetricKRGPECO
Share price$24.08$37.39
Market cap$4.94B$5.29B
1-day change+1.39%+0.92%
YTD return+0.46%+4.16%
1-year return+7.98%+10.99%
5-year return+10.21%+17.88%
P/E ratio (TTM)15.0532.80
Forward P/E70.8255.14
EPS (TTM)$1.60$1.14
Dividend yield4.73%3.44%
Annual dividend$1.14$1.29
Revenue (latest FY)$844.37M$726.59M
Revenue growth (YoY)+0.82%+9.86%
Net income (latest FY)$298.66M$111.30M
Net margin35.37%15.32%
52-week high$29.92$44.38
52-week low$21.33$32.98
Distance from 52-week high-19.52%-15.74%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+26.25%+16.66%
Average volume2.40M954.11K
Shares outstanding200.35M128.70M
Employees228320
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryReal Estate Investment TrustsReal Estate Investment Trusts

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Phillips Edison trades at a higher earnings multiple (32.8x vs 15.1x trailing P/E).
  • Kite Realty Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.73% vs 3.44%).
  • Kite Realty Group is more profitable, keeping 35.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 15.3 cents for Phillips Edison.
  • Phillips Edison grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+9.86% vs +0.82%).

About Kite Realty Group

KRG stock →

Kite Realty Group Trust is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns and operates a high-quality portfolio of open-air shopping centers and mixed-use destinations. The Company's portfolio is concentrated in high-growth Sun Belt and select strategic gateway markets.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 228 employees

About Phillips Edison

PECO stock →

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is one of the nation's largest owners and operators of high-quality, grocery-anchored neighborhood shopping centers.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 320 employees

KRG vs PECO FAQ

Which is bigger, Kite Realty Group or Phillips Edison?

Phillips Edison (PECO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.29B compared with $4.94B for Kite Realty Group (KRG).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, KRG or PECO?

PECO returned +10.99% over the past 12 months, compared with +7.98% for KRG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, KRG or PECO?

KRG has the lower trailing P/E at 15.1, versus 32.8 for PECO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Kite Realty Group or Phillips Edison?

Kite Realty Group has the higher yield at 4.73%, compared with 3.44% for Phillips Edison.

Are Kite Realty Group and Phillips Edison in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.

More comparisons