MetaCap

VICI Properties (VICI) vs Ventas (VTR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Ventas (VTR) has outperformed VICI Properties (VICI) over the past year, gaining 16.3% versus a loss of 29.2%. Over five years, VTR leads with a +43.0% price change compared with -24.7% for VICI. Ventas is the larger company by market cap ($41.06 billion vs $24.93 billion), about 1.6 times the size.

On valuation, VICI Properties trades at a lower forward P/E (7.6x vs 101.3x for Ventas). VICI Properties offers the higher dividend yield (7.95% vs 2.50%). VICI Properties converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 69.3% versus 4.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

VICI-29.23%VTR+16.25%
+50%+8%-33%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
VICI-22.55%VTR+46.65%
+90%+25%-40%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

VICI versus VTR key metrics
MetricVICIVTR
Share price$22.64$80.04
Market cap$24.93B$41.06B
1-day change-0.40%-2.22%
YTD return-19.49%+3.44%
1-year return-29.23%+16.25%
5-year return-24.71%+43.01%
P/E ratio (TTM)8.81148.22
Forward P/E7.57101.32
EPS (TTM)$2.57$0.54
Dividend yield7.95%2.50%
Annual dividend$1.80$2.00
Revenue (latest FY)$4.01B$5.83B
Revenue growth (YoY)+4.08%+18.47%
Net income (latest FY)$2.78B$261.52M
Gross margin99.33%—
Net margin69.28%4.48%
52-week high$31.69$101.60
52-week low$22.43$66.93
Distance from 52-week high-28.56%-21.22%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+39.89%+27.21%
Average volume9.55M3.43M
Shares outstanding1.10B512.95M
Employees28542
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryReal Estate Investment TrustsReal Estate Investment Trusts

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • VTR has outperformed VICI by 45.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Ventas trades at a higher earnings multiple (148.2x vs 8.8x trailing P/E).
  • VICI Properties offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (7.95% vs 2.50%).
  • VICI Properties is more profitable, keeping 69.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 4.5 cents for Ventas.
  • Ventas grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.47% vs +4.08%).

About VICI Properties

VICI stock →

VICI Properties Inc. is an S&P 500 experiential real estate investment trust that owns one of the largest portfolios of market-leading gaming, hospitality, wellness, entertainment and leisure destinations, including Caesars Palace Las Vegas, MGM Grand and the Venetian Resort Las Vegas, three of the most iconic entertainment facilities on the Las Vegas Strip.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 28 employees

About Ventas

VTR stock →

Ventas, Inc. is an S&P 500 company enabling exceptional environments that benefit a large and growing aging population.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 542 employees

VICI vs VTR FAQ

Which is bigger, VICI Properties or Ventas?

Ventas (VTR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $41.06B compared with $24.93B for VICI Properties (VICI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, VICI or VTR?

VTR returned +16.25% over the past 12 months, compared with -29.23% for VICI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, VICI or VTR?

VICI has the lower trailing P/E at 8.8, versus 148.2 for VTR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, VICI Properties or Ventas?

VICI Properties has the higher yield at 7.95%, compared with 2.50% for Ventas.

Are VICI Properties and Ventas in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.

More comparisons