MetaCap

Crown Castle (CCI) vs Ventas (VTR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Ventas (VTR) has outperformed Crown Castle (CCI) over the past year, gaining 16.3% versus a loss of 27.5%. Over five years, VTR leads with a +43.0% price change compared with -59.1% for CCI. Ventas is the larger company by market cap ($41.94 billion vs $30.10 billion), about 1.4 times the size.

On valuation, Crown Castle trades at a lower forward P/E (23.8x vs 103.5x for Ventas). Crown Castle offers the higher dividend yield (6.17% vs 2.45%). Crown Castle converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.4% versus 4.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CCI-27.46%VTR+16.25%
+50%+8%-34%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CCI-59.36%VTR+46.65%
+91%+12%-68%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CCI versus VTR key metrics
MetricCCIVTR
Share price$68.89$81.76
Market cap$30.10B$41.94B
1-day change-0.17%+2.15%
YTD return-22.35%+3.44%
1-year return-27.46%+16.25%
5-year return-59.13%+43.01%
P/E ratio (TTM)28.00151.41
Forward P/E23.76103.49
EPS (TTM)$2.46$0.54
Dividend yield6.17%2.45%
Annual dividend$4.25$2.00
Revenue (latest FY)$4.26B$5.83B
Revenue growth (YoY)-4.39%+18.47%
Net income (latest FY)$444.00M$261.52M
Gross margin97.35%—
Operating margin48.66%—
Net margin10.41%4.48%
52-week high$100.50$101.60
52-week low$65.32$66.93
Distance from 52-week high-31.45%-19.53%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+37.10%+24.54%
Average volume3.56M3.44M
Shares outstanding437.00M512.95M
Employees1,500542
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryReal Estate Investment TrustsReal Estate Investment Trusts

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • VTR has outperformed CCI by 43.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Ventas trades at a higher earnings multiple (151.4x vs 28.0x trailing P/E).
  • Crown Castle offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.17% vs 2.45%).
  • Crown Castle is more profitable, keeping 10.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 4.5 cents for Ventas.
  • Ventas grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.47% vs -4.39%).

About Crown Castle

CCI stock →

Crown Castle owns, operates and leases approximately 40,000 cell towers across the U.S. This nationwide portfolio serves as the foundation of wireless connectivity that provides cities and communities access to essential data, technology and wireless service – bringing information, ideas, innovations and the connectivity of modern life to help people and businesses thrive.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 1,500 employees

About Ventas

VTR stock →

Ventas, Inc. is an S&P 500 company enabling exceptional environments that benefit a large and growing aging population.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 542 employees

CCI vs VTR FAQ

Which is bigger, Crown Castle or Ventas?

Ventas (VTR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $41.94B compared with $30.10B for Crown Castle (CCI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CCI or VTR?

VTR returned +16.25% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.46% for CCI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CCI or VTR?

CCI has the lower trailing P/E at 28.0, versus 151.4 for VTR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Crown Castle or Ventas?

Crown Castle has the higher yield at 6.17%, compared with 2.45% for Ventas.

Are Crown Castle and Ventas in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.

More comparisons