Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) vs Golub Capital BDC (GBDC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) has outperformed Golub Capital BDC (GBDC) over the past year, gaining 108.2% versus a loss of 11.4%. Over five years, AAMI leads with a +245.9% price change compared with -24.7% for GBDC. Acadian Asset Management is the larger company by market cap ($3.28 billion vs $3.12 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Golub Capital BDC trades at a lower forward P/E (9.4x vs 14.3x for Acadian Asset Management). Golub Capital BDC offers the higher dividend yield (12.00% vs 0.33%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | AAMI | GBDC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $92.55 | $12.00 |
| Market cap | $3.28B | $3.12B |
| 1-day change | -1.01% | -1.56% |
| YTD return | +96.91% | -11.57% |
| 1-year return | +108.16% | -11.44% |
| 5-year return | +245.85% | -24.72% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 33.17 | 18.18 |
| Forward P/E | 14.28 | 9.45 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.79 | $0.66 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 12.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.31 | $1.44 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $563.70M | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.49% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $80.00M | $376.65M |
| Operating margin | 23.43% | — |
| Net margin | 14.19% | — |
| 52-week high | $98.52 | $14.41 |
| 52-week low | $41.47 | $11.77 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -6.06% | -16.72% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | none |
| Avg. price target upside | -1.67% | +13.58% |
| Average volume | 424.01K | 1.24M |
| Shares outstanding | 35.49M | 259.65M |
| Employees | 396 | — |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- AAMI has outperformed GBDC by 119.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Acadian Asset Management trades at a higher earnings multiple (33.2x vs 18.2x trailing P/E).
- Golub Capital BDC offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (12.00% vs 0.33%).
About Acadian Asset Management
AAMI stock →Acadian Asset Management Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company.
Finance · Investment Managers · 396 employees
About Golub Capital BDC
GBDC stock →Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is a Private Debt, business development company and operates as an externally managed closed-end non-diversified management investment company.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services
AAMI vs GBDC FAQ
Which is bigger, Acadian Asset Management or Golub Capital BDC?
Acadian Asset Management (AAMI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.28B compared with $3.12B for Golub Capital BDC (GBDC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, AAMI or GBDC?
AAMI returned +108.16% over the past 12 months, compared with -11.44% for GBDC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, AAMI or GBDC?
GBDC has the lower trailing P/E at 18.2, versus 33.2 for AAMI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acadian Asset Management or Golub Capital BDC?
Golub Capital BDC has the higher yield at 12.00%, compared with 0.33% for Acadian Asset Management.
Are Acadian Asset Management and Golub Capital BDC in the same industry?
Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Investment Managers for Acadian Asset Management and Finance: Consumer Services for Golub Capital BDC.