MetaCap

Akamai Technologies (AKAM) vs Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Akamai Technologies (AKAM) has outperformed Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) over the past year, gaining 36.6% versus a loss of 32.4%. Over five years, AKAM leads with a -1.6% price change compared with -11.0% for BR. Broadridge Financial Solutions is the larger company by market cap ($18.04 billion vs $14.62 billion), about 1.2 times the size.

On valuation, Broadridge Financial Solutions trades at a lower forward P/E (13.8x vs 14.8x for Akamai Technologies). Broadridge Financial Solutions pays a dividend yielding 2.44%, while Akamai Technologies does not currently pay one. Broadridge Financial Solutions converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.0% versus 10.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AKAM+36.57%BR-32.41%
+118%+34%-50%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AKAM+2.37%BR-5.21%
+62%+13%-35%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AKAM versus BR key metrics
MetricAKAMBR
Share price$101.71$159.82
Market cap$14.62B$18.04B
1-day change-2.77%-0.20%
YTD return+19.90%-28.25%
1-year return+36.57%-32.41%
5-year return-1.61%-11.01%
P/E ratio (TTM)36.8516.65
Forward P/E14.8513.81
EPS (TTM)$2.76$9.60
Dividend yield0.00%2.44%
Annual dividend$0.00$3.90
Revenue (latest FY)$4.21B$7.48B
Revenue growth (YoY)+5.44%+8.53%
Net income (latest FY)$452.03M$1.12B
Gross margin58.95%31.78%
Operating margin13.47%17.40%
Net margin10.74%15.04%
52-week high$165.45$237.39
52-week low$70.82$133.83
Distance from 52-week high-38.53%-32.68%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+56.20%+33.52%
Average volume4.15M1.09M
Shares outstanding143.72M112.90M
Employees11,00016,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryBusiness ServicesBusiness Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • AKAM has outperformed BR by 69.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Akamai Technologies trades at a higher earnings multiple (36.9x vs 16.6x trailing P/E).
  • Broadridge Financial Solutions offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.44% vs 0.00%).

About Akamai Technologies

AKAM stock →

Akamai Technologies, Inc. engages in the provision of security, delivery, and cloud computing solutions in the United States and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 11,000 employees

About Broadridge Financial Solutions

BR stock →

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. provides investor communications and technology-driven solutions for the financial services industry in the United States and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 16,000 employees

AKAM vs BR FAQ

Which is bigger, Akamai Technologies or Broadridge Financial Solutions?

Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $18.04B compared with $14.62B for Akamai Technologies (AKAM).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AKAM or BR?

AKAM returned +36.57% over the past 12 months, compared with -32.41% for BR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AKAM or BR?

BR has the lower trailing P/E at 16.6, versus 36.9 for AKAM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Akamai Technologies or Broadridge Financial Solutions?

Broadridge Financial Solutions pays a dividend yielding 2.44%, while Akamai Technologies does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Akamai Technologies and Broadridge Financial Solutions in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons