MetaCap

Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) vs Global Payments (GPN)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Global Payments (GPN) has outperformed Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) over the past year, losing 8.0% versus a loss of 32.4%. Over five years, BR leads with a -11.0% price change compared with -49.5% for GPN. Global Payments is the larger company by market cap ($21.46 billion vs $18.08 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Broadridge Financial Solutions is growing revenue faster (+8.5% vs -0.4%).

On valuation, Global Payments trades at a lower forward P/E (5.1x vs 13.8x for Broadridge Financial Solutions). Broadridge Financial Solutions offers the higher dividend yield (2.44% vs 1.23%). Global Payments converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.2% versus 15.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

BR-32.41%GPN-7.97%
+10%-18%-45%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
BR-5.21%GPN-49.13%
+63%-1%-66%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

BR versus GPN key metrics
MetricBRGPN
Share price$160.13$81.08
Market cap$18.08B$21.46B
1-day change+0.93%-0.87%
YTD return-28.25%+4.75%
1-year return-32.41%-7.97%
5-year return-11.01%-49.51%
P/E ratio (TTM)16.6838.07
Forward P/E13.835.06
EPS (TTM)$9.60$2.13
Dividend yield2.44%1.23%
Annual dividend$3.90$1.00
Revenue (latest FY)$7.48B$7.71B
Revenue growth (YoY)+8.53%-0.39%
Net income (latest FY)$1.12B$1.40B
Gross margin31.78%72.57%
Operating margin17.40%22.77%
Net margin15.04%18.17%
52-week high$237.39$95.88
52-week low$133.83$61.16
Distance from 52-week high-32.55%-15.44%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+33.25%+29.50%
Average volume1.09M2.79M
Shares outstanding112.90M264.62M
Employees16,00026,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryBusiness ServicesBusiness Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • GPN has outperformed BR by 24.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • Global Payments trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.1x vs 16.7x trailing P/E).
  • Broadridge Financial Solutions offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.44% vs 1.23%).
  • Broadridge Financial Solutions grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.53% vs -0.39%).

About Broadridge Financial Solutions

BR stock →

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. provides investor communications and technology-driven solutions for the financial services industry in the United States and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 16,000 employees

About Global Payments

GPN stock →

Global Payments Inc. provides payment technology and software solutions for card, check, and digital-based payments in the Americas, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific.

Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 26,000 employees

BR vs GPN FAQ

Which is bigger, Broadridge Financial Solutions or Global Payments?

Global Payments (GPN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $21.46B compared with $18.08B for Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, BR or GPN?

GPN returned -7.97% over the past 12 months, compared with -32.41% for BR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, BR or GPN?

BR has the lower trailing P/E at 16.7, versus 38.1 for GPN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Broadridge Financial Solutions or Global Payments?

Broadridge Financial Solutions has the higher yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.23% for Global Payments.

Are Broadridge Financial Solutions and Global Payments in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons