MetaCap

Aramark (ARMK) vs Yum! Brands (YUM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Aramark (ARMK) has outperformed Yum! Brands (YUM) over the past year, gaining 43.7% versus a loss of 2.1%. Over five years, ARMK leads with a +111.2% price change compared with +14.2% for YUM. Yum! Brands is the larger company by market cap ($39.02 billion vs $14.64 billion), about 2.7 times the size.

On valuation, Aramark trades at a lower forward P/E (19.7x vs 20.5x for Yum! Brands). Yum! Brands offers the higher dividend yield (1.02% vs 0.86%). Yum! Brands converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 19.0% versus 1.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ARMK+43.74%YUM-2.07%
+65%+27%-10%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
ARMK+109.89%YUM+15.89%
+144%+58%-27%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ARMK versus YUM key metrics
MetricARMKYUM
Share price$55.54$143.00
Market cap$14.64B$39.02B
1-day change+0.22%+1.89%
YTD return+50.68%-5.47%
1-year return+43.74%-2.07%
5-year return+111.16%+14.21%
P/E ratio (TTM)38.8418.01
Forward P/E19.7520.52
EPS (TTM)$1.43$7.94
Dividend yield0.86%1.02%
Annual dividend$0.48$1.46
Revenue (latest FY)$18.51B$8.21B
Revenue growth (YoY)+6.35%+8.81%
Net income (latest FY)$326.39M$1.56B
Gross margin8.36%69.77%
Operating margin4.28%31.34%
Net margin1.76%18.98%
52-week high$62.65$170.14
52-week low$35.07$134.26
Distance from 52-week high-11.35%-15.95%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+23.33%+19.72%
Average volume2.41M2.48M
Shares outstanding263.63M272.90M
Employees278,39049,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurants

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Yum! Brands is about 2.7 times larger than Aramark by market value ($39.02B vs $14.64B).
  • ARMK has outperformed YUM by 45.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • Aramark trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.8x vs 18.0x trailing P/E).
  • Yum! Brands is more profitable, keeping 19.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.8 cents for Aramark.

About Aramark

ARMK stock →

Aramark provides food and facilities services to education, healthcare, business and industry, sports, leisure, and corrections clients in the United States and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Food and Support Services United States, and Food and Support Services International.

Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 278,390 employees

About Yum! Brands

YUM stock →

Yum! Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops, operates, and franchises traditional and non-traditional quick service restaurants in the United States, China, and internationally. The company operates in four segments: KFC Division, Taco Bell Division, Pizza Hut Division, and Habit Burger & Grill Division.

Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 49,000 employees

ARMK vs YUM FAQ

Which is bigger, Aramark or Yum! Brands?

Yum! Brands (YUM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $39.02B compared with $14.64B for Aramark (ARMK).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ARMK or YUM?

ARMK returned +43.74% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.07% for YUM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ARMK or YUM?

YUM has the lower trailing P/E at 18.0, versus 38.8 for ARMK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Aramark or Yum! Brands?

Yum! Brands has the higher yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.86% for Aramark.

Are Aramark and Yum! Brands in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons