MetaCap

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) vs Yum! Brands (YUM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) has outperformed Yum! Brands (YUM) over the past year, gaining 5.0% versus a loss of 4.3%. Over five years, QSR leads with a +13.1% price change compared with +12.1% for YUM. Yum! Brands is the larger company by market cap ($39.02 billion vs $32.37 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Restaurant Brands International is growing revenue faster (+12.2% vs +8.8%).

On valuation, Restaurant Brands International trades at a lower forward P/E (16.0x vs 20.5x for Yum! Brands). Restaurant Brands International offers the higher dividend yield (3.59% vs 1.02%). Yum! Brands converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 19.0% versus 11.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

QSR+3.16%YUM-3.89%
+23%+7%-8%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
QSR+11.57%YUM+13.75%
+39%+7%-26%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

QSR versus YUM key metrics
MetricQSRYUM
Share price$70.66$143.00
Market cap$32.37B$39.02B
1-day change+1.77%+1.89%
YTD return+3.56%-7.23%
1-year return+4.99%-4.34%
5-year return+13.13%+12.09%
P/E ratio (TTM)17.7518.01
Forward P/E15.9620.52
EPS (TTM)$3.98$7.94
Dividend yield3.59%1.02%
Annual dividend$2.54$1.46
Revenue (latest FY)$9.43B$8.21B
Revenue growth (YoY)+12.23%+8.81%
Net income (latest FY)$1.07B$1.56B
Gross margin—69.77%
Operating margin23.34%31.34%
Net margin11.39%18.98%
52-week high$81.96$170.14
52-week low$64.52$134.26
Distance from 52-week high-13.79%-15.95%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+21.65%+19.72%
Average volume2.74M2.51M
Shares outstanding348.76M272.90M
Employees53,50049,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurants

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Restaurant Brands International offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.59% vs 1.02%).
  • Yum! Brands is more profitable, keeping 19.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 11.4 cents for Restaurant Brands International.

About Restaurant Brands International

QSR stock →

Restaurant Brands International Inc. operates as a quick service restaurant company in Canada, the United States, and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 53,500 employees

About Yum! Brands

YUM stock →

Yum! Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops, operates, and franchises traditional and non-traditional quick service restaurants in the United States, China, and internationally. The company operates in four segments: KFC Division, Taco Bell Division, Pizza Hut Division, and Habit Burger & Grill Division.

Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 49,000 employees

QSR vs YUM FAQ

Which is bigger, Restaurant Brands International or Yum! Brands?

Yum! Brands (YUM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $39.02B compared with $32.37B for Restaurant Brands International (QSR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, QSR or YUM?

QSR returned +4.99% over the past 12 months, compared with -4.34% for YUM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, QSR or YUM?

QSR has the lower trailing P/E at 17.8, versus 18.0 for YUM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Restaurant Brands International or Yum! Brands?

Restaurant Brands International has the higher yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.02% for Yum! Brands.

Are Restaurant Brands International and Yum! Brands in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons