BP p.l.c. (BP) vs ConocoPhillips (COP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
ConocoPhillips (COP) has outperformed BP p.l.c. (BP) over the past year, gaining 36.3% versus a gain of 27.3%. Over five years, COP leads with a +75.1% price change compared with +48.7% for BP. ConocoPhillips is the larger company by market cap ($155.98 billion vs $114.64 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, BP p.l.c. trades at a lower forward P/E (8.3x vs 13.4x for ConocoPhillips). ConocoPhillips offers the higher dividend yield (2.54% vs 0.75%). ConocoPhillips converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.6% versus 0.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BP | COP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $44.51 | $129.84 |
| Market cap | $114.64B | $155.98B |
| 1-day change | -1.11% | +0.38% |
| YTD return | +28.16% | +38.70% |
| 1-year return | +27.28% | +36.34% |
| 5-year return | +48.71% | +75.13% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 21.93 | 17.20 |
| Forward P/E | 8.34 | 13.42 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.03 | $7.55 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 2.54% |
| Annual dividend | $0.336 | $3.30 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $192.55B | $58.94B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.07% | +7.67% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $55.00M | $7.99B |
| Gross margin | — | 62.13% |
| Operating margin | 6.57% | — |
| Net margin | 0.03% | 13.55% |
| 52-week high | $48.27 | $141.62 |
| 52-week low | $32.72 | $85.57 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -7.79% | -8.32% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +15.52% | +13.12% |
| Average volume | 8.76M | 6.62M |
| Shares outstanding | 2.58B | 1.20B |
| Employees | 93,700 | 9,600 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Integrated oil Companies | Integrated oil Companies |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BP p.l.c. trades at a higher earnings multiple (21.9x vs 17.2x trailing P/E).
- ConocoPhillips offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.54% vs 0.75%).
- ConocoPhillips is more profitable, keeping 13.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 0.0 cents for BP p.l.c..
- ConocoPhillips grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.67% vs -1.07%).
About BP p.l.c.
BP stock →BP p.l.c., an integrated energy company, engages in the oil and gas business worldwide. The company operates through Gas & Low Carbon Energy, Oil Production & Operations, and Customers & Products segments.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 93,700 employees
About ConocoPhillips
COP stock →ConocoPhillips explores for, produces, transports, and markets crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and natural gas liquids. It operates in five segments: Alaska; Lower 48; Canada; Europe, Middle East and North Africa; and Asia Pacific.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 9,600 employees
BP vs COP FAQ
Which is bigger, BP p.l.c. or ConocoPhillips?
ConocoPhillips (COP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $155.98B compared with $114.64B for BP p.l.c. (BP).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BP or COP?
COP returned +36.34% over the past 12 months, compared with +27.28% for BP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BP or COP?
COP has the lower trailing P/E at 17.2, versus 21.9 for BP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, BP p.l.c. or ConocoPhillips?
ConocoPhillips has the higher yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.75% for BP p.l.c..
Are BP p.l.c. and ConocoPhillips in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated oil Companies industry within the Energy sector.