MetaCap

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Equinor ASA (EQNR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Equinor ASA (EQNR) has outperformed ConocoPhillips (COP) over the past year, gaining 63.9% versus a gain of 36.3%. Over five years, COP leads with a +75.1% price change compared with +52.7% for EQNR. ConocoPhillips is the larger company by market cap ($155.98 billion vs $98.58 billion), about 1.6 times the size.

On valuation, Equinor ASA trades at a lower forward P/E (8.8x vs 13.4x for ConocoPhillips). Equinor ASA offers the higher dividend yield (3.70% vs 2.54%). ConocoPhillips converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.6% versus 4.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

COP+36.34%EQNR+63.88%
+85%+34%-16%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
COP+73.30%EQNR+58.03%
+88%+34%-20%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

COP versus EQNR key metrics
MetricCOPEQNR
Share price$129.84$41.61
Market cap$155.98B$98.58B
1-day change+0.38%-3.26%
YTD return+38.70%+76.09%
1-year return+36.34%+63.88%
5-year return+75.13%+52.70%
P/E ratio (TTM)17.2011.37
Forward P/E13.428.78
EPS (TTM)$7.55$3.66
Dividend yield2.54%3.70%
Annual dividend$3.30$1.54
Revenue (latest FY)$58.94B$106.46B
Revenue growth (YoY)+7.67%+2.59%
Net income (latest FY)$7.99B$5.04B
Gross margin62.13%48.18%
Operating margin—23.81%
Net margin13.55%4.74%
52-week high$141.62$45.84
52-week low$85.57$22.26
Distance from 52-week high-8.32%-9.23%
Analyst consensusbuyhold
Avg. price target upside+13.12%-6.68%
Average volume6.62M3.46M
Shares outstanding1.20B2.37B
Employees9,60023,545
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryIntegrated oil CompaniesIntegrated oil Companies

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • EQNR has outperformed COP by 27.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • ConocoPhillips trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.2x vs 11.4x trailing P/E).
  • Equinor ASA offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.70% vs 2.54%).
  • ConocoPhillips is more profitable, keeping 13.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 4.7 cents for Equinor ASA.
  • ConocoPhillips grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.67% vs +2.59%).

About ConocoPhillips

COP stock →

ConocoPhillips explores for, produces, transports, and markets crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and natural gas liquids. It operates in five segments: Alaska; Lower 48; Canada; Europe, Middle East and North Africa; and Asia Pacific.

Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 9,600 employees

About Equinor ASA

EQNR stock →

Equinor ASA operates as an energy company in Norway and internationally. It operates through Exploration & Production Norway; Exploration & Production International; Exploration & Production USA; Marketing, Midstream & Processing; and Renewables segments.

Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 23,545 employees

COP vs EQNR FAQ

Which is bigger, ConocoPhillips or Equinor ASA?

ConocoPhillips (COP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $155.98B compared with $98.58B for Equinor ASA (EQNR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, COP or EQNR?

EQNR returned +63.88% over the past 12 months, compared with +36.34% for COP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, COP or EQNR?

EQNR has the lower trailing P/E at 11.4, versus 17.2 for COP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, ConocoPhillips or Equinor ASA?

Equinor ASA has the higher yield at 3.70%, compared with 2.54% for ConocoPhillips.

Are ConocoPhillips and Equinor ASA in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated oil Companies industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons