ConocoPhillips (COP) vs Phillips 66 (PSX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Phillips 66 (PSX) has outperformed ConocoPhillips (COP) over the past year, gaining 105.2% versus a gain of 36.3%. Over five years, PSX leads with a +234.4% price change compared with +75.1% for COP. ConocoPhillips is the larger company by market cap ($155.98 billion vs $108.90 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, Phillips 66 trades at a lower forward P/E (10.2x vs 13.4x for ConocoPhillips). ConocoPhillips offers the higher dividend yield (2.54% vs 1.82%). ConocoPhillips converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.6% versus 3.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | COP | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $129.84 | $271.62 |
| Market cap | $155.98B | $108.90B |
| 1-day change | +0.38% | +0.68% |
| YTD return | +38.70% | +110.49% |
| 1-year return | +36.34% | +105.20% |
| 5-year return | +75.13% | +234.43% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.20 | 15.42 |
| Forward P/E | 13.42 | 10.18 |
| EPS (TTM) | $7.55 | $17.62 |
| Dividend yield | 2.54% | 1.82% |
| Annual dividend | $3.30 | $4.94 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $58.94B | $132.38B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.67% | -7.53% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $7.99B | $4.40B |
| Gross margin | 62.13% | 12.30% |
| Net margin | 13.55% | 3.33% |
| 52-week high | $141.62 | $277.12 |
| 52-week low | $85.57 | $126.74 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -8.32% | -1.98% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +13.12% | -5.32% |
| Average volume | 6.62M | 2.87M |
| Shares outstanding | 1.20B | 400.94M |
| Employees | 9,600 | 12,600 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Integrated oil Companies | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PSX has outperformed COP by 68.9 percentage points over the past year.
- ConocoPhillips is more profitable, keeping 13.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.3 cents for Phillips 66.
- ConocoPhillips grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.67% vs -7.53%).
About ConocoPhillips
COP stock →ConocoPhillips explores for, produces, transports, and markets crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and natural gas liquids. It operates in five segments: Alaska; Lower 48; Canada; Europe, Middle East and North Africa; and Asia Pacific.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 9,600 employees
About Phillips 66
PSX stock →Phillips 66 operates as an integrated downstream energy provider in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and internationally. It operates through five segments: Midstream, Chemicals, Refining, Marketing and Specialties (M&S), and Renewable Fuels.
Energy · Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · 12,600 employees
COP vs PSX FAQ
Which is bigger, ConocoPhillips or Phillips 66?
ConocoPhillips (COP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $155.98B compared with $108.90B for Phillips 66 (PSX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, COP or PSX?
PSX returned +105.20% over the past 12 months, compared with +36.34% for COP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, COP or PSX?
PSX has the lower trailing P/E at 15.4, versus 17.2 for COP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, ConocoPhillips or Phillips 66?
ConocoPhillips has the higher yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.82% for Phillips 66.
Are ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66 in the same industry?
Both are in the Energy sector, but in different industries: Integrated oil Companies for ConocoPhillips and Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing for Phillips 66.