MetaCap

Akamai Technologies (AKAM) vs Global Payments (GPN)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Akamai Technologies (AKAM) has outperformed Global Payments (GPN) over the past year, gaining 36.6% versus a loss of 6.5%. Over five years, AKAM leads with a -1.6% price change compared with -48.5% for GPN. Global Payments is the larger company by market cap ($21.90 billion vs $14.50 billion), about 1.5 times the size, while Akamai Technologies is growing revenue faster (+5.4% vs -0.4%).

On valuation, Global Payments trades at a lower forward P/E (5.2x vs 14.7x for Akamai Technologies). Global Payments pays a dividend yielding 1.21%, while Akamai Technologies does not currently pay one. Global Payments converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.2% versus 10.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

AKAM+36.57%GPN-7.97%
+117%+41%-36%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
AKAM+2.37%GPN-48.07%
+53%-6%-65%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

AKAM versus GPN key metrics
MetricAKAMGPN
Share price$100.90$82.77
Market cap$14.50B$21.90B
1-day change-3.55%+2.08%
YTD return+19.90%+6.94%
1-year return+36.57%-6.51%
5-year return-1.61%-48.46%
P/E ratio (TTM)36.5638.86
Forward P/E14.735.17
EPS (TTM)$2.76$2.13
Dividend yield0.00%1.21%
Annual dividend$0.00$1.00
Revenue (latest FY)$4.21B$7.71B
Revenue growth (YoY)+5.44%-0.39%
Net income (latest FY)$452.03M$1.40B
Gross margin58.95%72.57%
Operating margin13.47%22.77%
Net margin10.74%18.17%
52-week high$165.45$95.88
52-week low$70.82$61.16
Distance from 52-week high-39.01%-13.67%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+57.45%+26.86%
Average volume4.15M2.79M
Shares outstanding143.72M264.62M
Employees11,00026,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryBusiness ServicesBusiness Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • AKAM has outperformed GPN by 43.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Global Payments offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.21% vs 0.00%).
  • Global Payments is more profitable, keeping 18.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 10.7 cents for Akamai Technologies.
  • Akamai Technologies grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+5.44% vs -0.39%).

About Akamai Technologies

AKAM stock →

Akamai Technologies, Inc. engages in the provision of security, delivery, and cloud computing solutions in the United States and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 11,000 employees

About Global Payments

GPN stock →

Global Payments Inc. provides payment technology and software solutions for card, check, and digital-based payments in the Americas, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific.

Consumer Discretionary · Business Services · 26,000 employees

AKAM vs GPN FAQ

Which is bigger, Akamai Technologies or Global Payments?

Global Payments (GPN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $21.90B compared with $14.50B for Akamai Technologies (AKAM).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, AKAM or GPN?

AKAM returned +36.57% over the past 12 months, compared with -6.51% for GPN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, AKAM or GPN?

AKAM has the lower trailing P/E at 36.6, versus 38.9 for GPN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Akamai Technologies or Global Payments?

Global Payments pays a dividend yielding 1.21%, while Akamai Technologies does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Akamai Technologies and Global Payments in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Business Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons