BorgWarner (BWA) vs Garrett Motion (GTX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Garrett Motion (GTX) has outperformed BorgWarner (BWA) over the past year, gaining 97.6% versus a gain of 44.1%. Over five years, GTX leads with a +260.1% price change compared with +49.1% for BWA. BorgWarner is the larger company by market cap ($12.48 billion vs $4.89 billion), about 2.6 times the size, while Garrett Motion is growing revenue faster (+3.1% vs +1.6%).
On valuation, BorgWarner trades at a lower forward P/E (10.4x vs 11.5x for Garrett Motion). Garrett Motion offers the higher dividend yield (1.14% vs 1.11%). Garrett Motion converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.6% versus 1.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BWA | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $61.30 | $26.24 |
| Market cap | $12.48B | $4.89B |
| 1-day change | -0.68% | +1.90% |
| YTD return | +36.97% | +47.73% |
| 1-year return | +44.10% | +97.62% |
| 5-year return | +49.08% | +260.14% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 30.65 | 14.42 |
| Forward P/E | 10.36 | 11.49 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.00 | $1.82 |
| Dividend yield | 1.11% | 1.14% |
| Annual dividend | $0.68 | $0.30 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $14.32B | $3.58B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.63% | +3.14% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $277.00M | $310.00M |
| Gross margin | 18.68% | 20.40% |
| Operating margin | 3.74% | — |
| Net margin | 1.93% | 8.65% |
| 52-week high | $78.82 | $36.25 |
| 52-week low | $40.50 | $12.26 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.23% | -27.61% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +32.58% | +37.20% |
| Average volume | 2.25M | 2.52M |
| Shares outstanding | 203.67M | 186.49M |
| Employees | 37,500 | 6,300 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Auto Parts:O.E.M. | Auto Parts:O.E.M. |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BorgWarner is about 2.6 times larger than Garrett Motion by market value ($12.48B vs $4.89B).
- GTX has outperformed BWA by 53.5 percentage points over the past year.
- BorgWarner trades at a higher earnings multiple (30.6x vs 14.4x trailing P/E).
- Garrett Motion is more profitable, keeping 8.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.9 cents for BorgWarner.
About BorgWarner
BWA stock →BorgWarner Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides technology solutions for combustion, hybrid, and electric vehicles worldwide. The company operates through the Turbos & Thermal Technologies; Drivetrain & Morse Systems; PowerDrive Systems; and Battery & Charging Systems segments.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 37,500 employees
About Garrett Motion
GTX stock →Garrett Motion Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells turbocharging, air and fluid compression, and high-speed electric motor technologies to original equipment manufacturers and independent aftermarket distributors in the mobility and industrial fields.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 6,300 employees
BWA vs GTX FAQ
Which is bigger, BorgWarner or Garrett Motion?
BorgWarner (BWA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.48B compared with $4.89B for Garrett Motion (GTX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BWA or GTX?
GTX returned +97.62% over the past 12 months, compared with +44.10% for BWA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BWA or GTX?
GTX has the lower trailing P/E at 14.4, versus 30.6 for BWA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, BorgWarner or Garrett Motion?
Garrett Motion has the higher yield at 1.14%, compared with 1.11% for BorgWarner.
Are BorgWarner and Garrett Motion in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.