Chubb (CB) vs W.R. Berkley (WRB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Chubb (CB) has outperformed W.R. Berkley (WRB) over the past year, gaining 15.7% versus a loss of 10.3%. Over five years, WRB leads with a +101.7% price change compared with +84.6% for CB. Chubb is the larger company by market cap ($129.13 billion vs $25.89 billion), about 5.0 times the size, while W.R. Berkley is growing revenue faster (+7.8% vs +6.5%).
On valuation, Chubb trades at a lower forward P/E (11.5x vs 14.3x for W.R. Berkley). Chubb offers the higher dividend yield (1.17% vs 0.53%). Chubb converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 17.4% versus 12.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CB | WRB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $334.70 | $69.73 |
| Market cap | $129.13B | $25.89B |
| 1-day change | +0.15% | +0.11% |
| YTD return | +7.23% | -0.56% |
| 1-year return | +15.72% | -10.34% |
| 5-year return | +84.60% | +101.71% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 11.84 | 14.35 |
| Forward P/E | 11.45 | 14.29 |
| EPS (TTM) | $28.27 | $4.86 |
| Dividend yield | 1.17% | 0.53% |
| Annual dividend | $3.93 | $0.37 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $59.40B | $14.71B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +6.54% | +7.84% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $10.31B | $1.78B |
| Net margin | 17.36% | 12.10% |
| 52-week high | $365.91 | $78.96 |
| 52-week low | $265.30 | $62.87 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -8.53% | -11.69% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +9.64% | -0.96% |
| Average volume | 1.78M | 2.51M |
| Shares outstanding | 385.80M | 371.23M |
| Employees | 45,000 | 8,804 |
| Sector | Financial Services | Finance |
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Chubb is about 5.0 times larger than W.R. Berkley by market value ($129.13B vs $25.89B).
- CB has outperformed WRB by 26.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Chubb is more profitable, keeping 17.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 12.1 cents for W.R. Berkley.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Chubb in Financial Services and W.R. Berkley in Finance.
About Chubb
CB stock →Chubb Limited provides insurance and reinsurance products worldwide. It operates in six segments: North America Commercial Property and Casualty (P&C) Insurance, North America Personal P&C Insurance, North America Agricultural Insurance, Overseas General Insurance, Global Reinsurance, and Life Insurance.
Financial Services · Insurance - Property & Casualty · 45,000 employees
About W.R. Berkley
WRB stock →W. R.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 8,804 employees
CB vs WRB FAQ
Which is bigger, Chubb or W.R. Berkley?
Chubb (CB) is larger, with a market capitalization of $129.13B compared with $25.89B for W.R. Berkley (WRB).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CB or WRB?
CB returned +15.72% over the past 12 months, compared with -10.34% for WRB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CB or WRB?
CB has the lower trailing P/E at 11.8, versus 14.3 for WRB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Chubb or W.R. Berkley?
Chubb has the higher yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.53% for W.R. Berkley.
Are Chubb and W.R. Berkley in the same industry?
No. Chubb is in the Financial Services sector, while W.R. Berkley is in Finance.