Church & Dwight (CHD) vs Procter & Gamble (PG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Church & Dwight (CHD) has outperformed Procter & Gamble (PG) over the past year, gaining 8.1% versus a loss of 2.6%. Over five years, CHD leads with a +16.6% price change compared with +2.8% for PG. Procter & Gamble is the larger company by market cap ($343.34 billion vs $22.95 billion), about 15.0 times the size.
On valuation, Procter & Gamble trades at a lower forward P/E (20.0x vs 24.0x for Church & Dwight). Procter & Gamble offers the higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 1.25%). Procter & Gamble converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.4% versus 11.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHD | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $96.75 | $147.82 |
| Market cap | $22.95B | $343.34B |
| 1-day change | +0.22% | -0.40% |
| YTD return | +16.05% | +3.63% |
| 1-year return | +8.11% | -2.64% |
| 5-year return | +16.61% | +2.83% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 31.01 | 22.33 |
| Forward P/E | 23.97 | 19.99 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.12 | $6.62 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 2.88% |
| Annual dividend | $1.21 | $4.26 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $6.20B | $87.03B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.57% | +3.26% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $736.80M | $16.05B |
| Gross margin | 44.73% | 50.18% |
| Operating margin | 17.37% | 22.69% |
| Net margin | 11.88% | 18.44% |
| 52-week high | $106.04 | $167.25 |
| 52-week low | $81.33 | $137.62 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -8.76% | -11.62% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +8.36% | +8.77% |
| Average volume | 1.82M | 8.60M |
| Shares outstanding | 237.20M | 2.32B |
| Employees | 5,550 | 104,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive | Consumer Defensive |
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Procter & Gamble is about 15.0 times larger than Church & Dwight by market value ($343.34B vs $22.95B).
- CHD has outperformed PG by 10.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Church & Dwight trades at a higher earnings multiple (31.0x vs 22.3x trailing P/E).
- Procter & Gamble offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 1.25%).
- Procter & Gamble is more profitable, keeping 18.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 11.9 cents for Church & Dwight.
About Church & Dwight
CHD stock →Church & Dwight Co., Inc. develops, manufactures, and markets household, personal care, and specialty products.
Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 5,550 employees
About Procter & Gamble
PG stock →The Procter & Gamble Company provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide. It operates through five segments: Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine & Family Care.
Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 104,000 employees
CHD vs PG FAQ
Which is bigger, Church & Dwight or Procter & Gamble?
Procter & Gamble (PG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $343.34B compared with $22.95B for Church & Dwight (CHD).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHD or PG?
CHD returned +8.11% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.64% for PG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHD or PG?
PG has the lower trailing P/E at 22.3, versus 31.0 for CHD. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Church & Dwight or Procter & Gamble?
Procter & Gamble has the higher yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.25% for Church & Dwight.
Are Church & Dwight and Procter & Gamble in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector.