Cipher Digital (CIFR) vs TeraWulf (WULF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
TeraWulf (WULF) has outperformed Cipher Digital (CIFR) over the past year, gaining 11.0% versus a loss of 23.3%. Over five years, CIFR leads with a +93.1% price change compared with -54.6% for WULF. TeraWulf is the larger company by market cap ($6.81 billion vs $5.60 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Cipher Digital is growing revenue faster (+48.0% vs +20.3%).
Cipher Digital converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of -367.2% versus -392.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CIFR | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $13.50 | $13.65 |
| Market cap | $5.60B | $6.81B |
| 1-day change | -7.28% | -5.21% |
| YTD return | -8.54% | +18.80% |
| 1-year return | -23.30% | +10.98% |
| 5-year return | +93.13% | -54.58% |
| Forward P/E | 102.42 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $-2.87 | $-4.43 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $223.94M | $168.46M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +48.04% | +20.28% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-822.24M | $-661.42M |
| Gross margin | 63.73% | 39.21% |
| Operating margin | -188.25% | -110.54% |
| Net margin | -367.17% | -392.64% |
| 52-week high | $30.14 | $29.84 |
| 52-week low | $11.72 | $10.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -55.21% | -54.26% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +125.78% | +145.27% |
| Average volume | 33.39M | 31.02M |
| Shares outstanding | 415.03M | 498.97M |
| Employees | 66 | 141 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WULF has outperformed CIFR by 34.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Cipher Digital is more profitable, keeping -367.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -392.6 cents for TeraWulf.
- Cipher Digital grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+48.04% vs +20.28%).
About Cipher Digital
CIFR stock →Cipher Digital Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops and operates industrial-scale data centers for bitcoin mining and high-performance compute (HPC) hosting in the United States. It develops HPC data center facilities across various sites for hyperscaler tenants; operates power at one bitcoin mining data center; and maintains a pipeline across various sites.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 66 employees
About TeraWulf
WULF stock →TeraWulf Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, operates digital infrastructure in the United States. It also develops and operates bitcoin mining facilities for bitcoin mining and high-performance computing workloads, leveraging clean, cost-effective, and reliable energy.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 141 employees
CIFR vs WULF FAQ
Which is bigger, Cipher Digital or TeraWulf?
TeraWulf (WULF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.81B compared with $5.60B for Cipher Digital (CIFR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CIFR or WULF?
WULF returned +10.98% over the past 12 months, compared with -23.30% for CIFR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Cipher Digital and TeraWulf in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance: Consumer Services industry within the Finance sector.