Cincinnati Financial (CINF) vs Markel Group (MKL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Cincinnati Financial (CINF) has outperformed Markel Group (MKL) over the past year, losing 2.5% versus a loss of 12.1%. Over five years, CINF leads with a +35.9% price change compared with +31.0% for MKL. Cincinnati Financial is the larger company by market cap ($25.36 billion vs $21.90 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Markel Group trades at a lower forward P/E (15.7x vs 18.2x for Cincinnati Financial). Cincinnati Financial pays a dividend yielding 2.19%, while Markel Group does not currently pay one. Cincinnati Financial converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.9% versus 13.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CINF | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $165.25 | $1,767.82 |
| Market cap | $25.36B | $21.90B |
| 1-day change | +2.25% | +2.29% |
| YTD return | -1.05% | -19.61% |
| 1-year return | -2.46% | -12.08% |
| 5-year return | +35.88% | +30.98% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.80 | 9.74 |
| Forward P/E | 18.24 | 15.65 |
| EPS (TTM) | $21.18 | $181.44 |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $3.62 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $12.63B | $15.51B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +11.41% | +4.72% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.39B | $2.11B |
| Operating margin | — | 20.59% |
| Net margin | 18.95% | 13.58% |
| 52-week high | $194.81 | $2,207.59 |
| 52-week low | $150.00 | $1,704.17 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.17% | -19.92% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +15.58% | +9.35% |
| Average volume | 684.62K | 67.60K |
| Shares outstanding | 153.48M | 12.39M |
| Employees | 5,705 | 22,900 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Cincinnati Financial offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.19% vs 0.00%).
- Cincinnati Financial is more profitable, keeping 18.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 13.6 cents for Markel Group.
- Cincinnati Financial grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+11.41% vs +4.72%).
About Cincinnati Financial
CINF stock →Cincinnati Financial Corporation provides property casualty insurance products in the United States. The company operates through five segments: Commercial Lines Insurance, Personal Lines Insurance, Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance, Life Insurance, and Investments.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 5,705 employees
About Markel Group
MKL stock →Markel Group Inc. engages in the insurance business in the United States, the United Kingdom, Bermuda, Germany, rest of the European Union, Canada, and the Asia Pacific.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 22,900 employees
CINF vs MKL FAQ
Which is bigger, Cincinnati Financial or Markel Group?
Cincinnati Financial (CINF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $25.36B compared with $21.90B for Markel Group (MKL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CINF or MKL?
CINF returned -2.46% over the past 12 months, compared with -12.08% for MKL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CINF or MKL?
CINF has the lower trailing P/E at 7.8, versus 9.7 for MKL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Cincinnati Financial or Markel Group?
Cincinnati Financial pays a dividend yielding 2.19%, while Markel Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Cincinnati Financial and Markel Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.