MetaCap

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs Procter & Gamble (PG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) has outperformed Procter & Gamble (PG) over the past year, gaining 11.0% versus a loss of 2.6%. Over five years, CL leads with a +15.1% price change compared with +2.8% for PG. Procter & Gamble is the larger company by market cap ($343.34 billion vs $69.52 billion), about 4.9 times the size.

On valuation, Procter & Gamble trades at a lower forward P/E (20.0x vs 21.3x for Colgate-Palmolive). Procter & Gamble offers the higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 2.40%). Procter & Gamble converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.4% versus 10.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CL+13.35%PG-1.26%
+30%+10%-10%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CL+16.14%PG+4.78%
+45%+15%-15%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CL versus PG key metrics
MetricCLPG
Share price$87.21$147.82
Market cap$69.52B$343.34B
1-day change-0.05%-0.40%
YTD return+11.10%+3.63%
1-year return+10.97%-2.64%
5-year return+15.13%+2.83%
P/E ratio (TTM)34.3322.33
Forward P/E21.2819.99
EPS (TTM)$2.54$6.62
Dividend yield2.40%2.88%
Annual dividend$2.09$4.26
Revenue (latest FY)$20.38B$87.03B
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.40%+3.26%
Net income (latest FY)$2.13B$16.05B
Gross margin60.11%50.18%
Operating margin16.22%22.69%
Net margin10.46%18.44%
52-week high$99.33$167.25
52-week low$74.55$137.62
Distance from 52-week high-12.20%-11.62%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+12.77%+8.77%
Average volume4.74M8.60M
Shares outstanding797.17M2.32B
Employees33,600104,000
SectorConsumer DefensiveConsumer Defensive
IndustryHousehold & Personal ProductsHousehold & Personal Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Procter & Gamble is about 4.9 times larger than Colgate-Palmolive by market value ($343.34B vs $69.52B).
  • CL has outperformed PG by 13.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • Colgate-Palmolive trades at a higher earnings multiple (34.3x vs 22.3x trailing P/E).
  • Procter & Gamble is more profitable, keeping 18.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 10.5 cents for Colgate-Palmolive.

About Colgate-Palmolive

CL stock →

Colgate-Palmolive Company, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells consumer products in the United States and internationally. It operates through two segments: Oral, Personal and Home Care; and Pet Nutrition.

Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 33,600 employees

About Procter & Gamble

PG stock →

The Procter & Gamble Company provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide. It operates through five segments: Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine & Family Care.

Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 104,000 employees

CL vs PG FAQ

Which is bigger, Colgate-Palmolive or Procter & Gamble?

Procter & Gamble (PG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $343.34B compared with $69.52B for Colgate-Palmolive (CL).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CL or PG?

CL returned +10.97% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.64% for PG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CL or PG?

PG has the lower trailing P/E at 22.3, versus 34.3 for CL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Colgate-Palmolive or Procter & Gamble?

Procter & Gamble has the higher yield at 2.88%, compared with 2.40% for Colgate-Palmolive.

Are Colgate-Palmolive and Procter & Gamble in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector.

More comparisons