MetaCap

Celestica (CLS) vs Fabrinet (FN)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Celestica (CLS) has outperformed Fabrinet (FN) over the past year, gaining 56.3% versus a gain of 34.5%. Over five years, CLS leads with a +3886.8% price change compared with +407.2% for FN. Celestica is the larger company by market cap ($46.86 billion vs $17.85 billion), about 2.6 times the size, while Fabrinet is growing revenue faster (+35.7% vs +28.5%).

On valuation, Celestica trades at a lower forward P/E (18.9x vs 22.9x for Fabrinet). Fabrinet converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.2% versus 6.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CLS+56.26%FN+34.53%
+107%+50%-7%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CLS+3882.53%FN+393.35%
+4611%+2183%-246%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CLS versus FN key metrics
MetricCLSFN
Share price$371.57$497.99
Market cap$46.86B$17.85B
1-day change-4.29%+1.81%
YTD return+25.70%+9.38%
1-year return+56.26%+34.53%
5-year return+3886.80%+407.22%
P/E ratio (TTM)38.5838.16
Forward P/E18.9122.86
EPS (TTM)$9.63$13.05
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$12.39B$4.64B
Revenue growth (YoY)+28.46%+35.73%
Net income (latest FY)$832.50M$473.03M
Gross margin12.06%11.99%
Operating margin8.40%9.97%
Net margin6.72%10.19%
52-week high$474.03$748.89
52-week low$238.23$361.19
Distance from 52-week high-21.61%-33.50%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+27.54%+47.41%
Average volume2.51M867.13K
Shares outstanding126.11M35.83M
Employees23,80321,521
SectorTechnologyUtilities
IndustryElectrical ProductsTelecommunications Equipment

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Celestica is about 2.6 times larger than Fabrinet by market value ($46.86B vs $17.85B).
  • CLS has outperformed FN by 21.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Fabrinet grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+35.73% vs +28.46%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Celestica in Technology and Fabrinet in Utilities.

About Celestica

CLS stock →

Celestica Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides supply chain solutions in Asia, North America, and internationally. It operates through two segments, Advanced Technology Solutions, and Connectivity and Cloud Solutions.

Technology · Electrical Products · 23,803 employees

About Fabrinet

FN stock →

Fabrinet provides optical packaging and precision optical, electro-mechanical, and electronic manufacturing services in North America, the Asia-Pacific, Europe, and internationally. The company offers a range of advanced optical and electro-mechanical capabilities in the manufacturing process, including process design and engineering, supply chain management, manufacturing, printed circuit board assembly, packaging, integration, final assembly, and testing.

Utilities · Telecommunications Equipment · 21,521 employees

CLS vs FN FAQ

Which is bigger, Celestica or Fabrinet?

Celestica (CLS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $46.86B compared with $17.85B for Fabrinet (FN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLS or FN?

CLS returned +56.26% over the past 12 months, compared with +34.53% for FN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CLS or FN?

FN has the lower trailing P/E at 38.2, versus 38.6 for CLS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are Celestica and Fabrinet in the same industry?

No. Celestica is in the Technology sector, while Fabrinet is in Utilities.

More comparisons