Celestica (CLS) vs Littelfuse (LFUS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Littelfuse (LFUS) has outperformed Celestica (CLS) over the past year, gaining 64.3% versus a gain of 39.9%. Over five years, CLS leads with a +3725.4% price change compared with +54.8% for LFUS. Celestica is the larger company by market cap ($44.96 billion vs $10.80 billion), about 4.2 times the size.
On valuation, Celestica trades at a lower forward P/E (18.1x vs 21.1x for Littelfuse). Littelfuse pays a dividend yielding 0.71%, while Celestica does not currently pay one. Celestica converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.7% versus -3.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CLS | LFUS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $356.53 | $425.30 |
| Market cap | $44.96B | $10.80B |
| 1-day change | -4.05% | -2.17% |
| YTD return | +20.61% | +68.16% |
| 1-year return | +39.88% | +64.27% |
| 5-year return | +3725.43% | +54.82% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 37.02 | — |
| Forward P/E | 18.14 | 21.09 |
| EPS (TTM) | $9.63 | $-0.50 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.71% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $3.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $12.39B | $2.39B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +28.46% | +8.92% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $832.50M | $-71.70M |
| Gross margin | 12.06% | 37.97% |
| Operating margin | 8.40% | 1.57% |
| Net margin | 6.72% | -3.00% |
| 52-week high | $474.03 | $500.57 |
| 52-week low | $238.23 | $233.36 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -24.79% | -15.04% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +32.92% | +14.92% |
| Average volume | 2.52M | 268.25K |
| Shares outstanding | 126.11M | 25.40M |
| Employees | 23,803 | 18,000 |
| Sector | Technology | Energy |
| Industry | Electrical Products | Electrical Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Celestica is about 4.2 times larger than Littelfuse by market value ($44.96B vs $10.80B).
- LFUS has outperformed CLS by 24.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Celestica is more profitable, keeping 6.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -3.0 cents for Littelfuse.
- Celestica grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+28.46% vs +8.92%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Celestica in Technology and Littelfuse in Energy.
About Celestica
CLS stock →Celestica Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides supply chain solutions in Asia, North America, and internationally. It operates through two segments, Advanced Technology Solutions, and Connectivity and Cloud Solutions.
Technology · Electrical Products · 23,803 employees
About Littelfuse
LFUS stock →Littelfuse, Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells electronic components, modules, and subassemblies.
Energy · Electrical Products · 18,000 employees
CLS vs LFUS FAQ
Which is bigger, Celestica or Littelfuse?
Celestica (CLS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $44.96B compared with $10.80B for Littelfuse (LFUS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLS or LFUS?
LFUS returned +64.27% over the past 12 months, compared with +39.88% for CLS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Celestica or Littelfuse?
Littelfuse pays a dividend yielding 0.71%, while Celestica does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Celestica and Littelfuse in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Technology sector.