Cohen & Steers (CNS) vs Maase (MAAS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Maase (MAAS) has outperformed Cohen & Steers (CNS) over the past year, gaining 285.1% versus a gain of 6.2%. Over five years, CNS leads with a -19.3% price change compared with -96.6% for MAAS. Maase is the larger company by market cap ($5.48 billion vs $3.63 billion), about 1.5 times the size, while Cohen & Steers is growing revenue faster (+7.5% vs -33.1%).
Cohen & Steers pays a dividend yielding 3.66%, while Maase does not currently pay one. Cohen & Steers converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 27.6% versus -25.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CNS | MAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $70.50 | $12.40 |
| Market cap | $3.63B | $5.48B |
| 1-day change | -2.84% | +3.77% |
| YTD return | +12.30% | +129.63% |
| 1-year return | +6.21% | +285.09% |
| 5-year return | -19.28% | -96.56% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 21.69 | — |
| Forward P/E | 17.71 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.25 | $-8.25 |
| Dividend yield | 3.66% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $2.58 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $556.12M | $109.05M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.48% | -33.14% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $153.22M | $-27.36M |
| Operating margin | 31.96% | -88.50% |
| Net margin | 27.55% | -25.09% |
| 52-week high | $86.56 | $24.90 |
| 52-week low | $58.39 | $2.85 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -18.55% | -50.20% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | — |
| Avg. price target upside | +8.27% | — |
| Average volume | 272.19K | 260.43K |
| Shares outstanding | 51.42M | 435.55M |
| Employees | 424 | — |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MAAS has outperformed CNS by 278.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Cohen & Steers offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.66% vs 0.00%).
- Cohen & Steers is more profitable, keeping 27.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -25.1 cents for Maase.
- Cohen & Steers grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.48% vs -33.14%).
About Cohen & Steers
CNS stock →Cohen & Steers, Inc. is a publicly owned asset management holding company.
Finance · Investment Managers · 424 employees
About Maase
MAAS stock →Maase Inc. operates as an integrated provider and operator of an artificial intelligence (AI) -centric full-scene digital systems.
Finance · Investment Managers
CNS vs MAAS FAQ
Which is bigger, Cohen & Steers or Maase?
Maase (MAAS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.48B compared with $3.63B for Cohen & Steers (CNS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CNS or MAAS?
MAAS returned +285.09% over the past 12 months, compared with +6.21% for CNS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Cohen & Steers or Maase?
Cohen & Steers pays a dividend yielding 3.66%, while Maase does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Cohen & Steers and Maase in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.