MetaCap

Crescent Energy (CRGY) vs Mach Natural Resources (MNR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 11, 2026.

Summary

Crescent Energy (CRGY) has outperformed Mach Natural Resources (MNR) over the past year, gaining 56.7% versus a loss of 12.4%. Crescent Energy is the larger company by market cap ($4.98 billion vs $1.79 billion), about 2.8 times the size. On valuation, Crescent Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (5.4x vs 8.2x for Mach Natural Resources).

Mach Natural Resources offers the higher dividend yield (16.78% vs 3.79%). Mach Natural Resources converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.2% versus 3.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CRGY+56.68%MNR-12.41%
+96%+37%-22%
Oct 10, 20251 yearOct 9, 2026
CRGY+2.26%MNR-42.93%
+38%-6%-49%
Oct 23, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CRGY versus MNR key metrics
MetricCRGYMNR
Share price$12.66$10.73
Market cap$4.98B$1.79B
1-day change-2.69%+0.56%
YTD return+50.89%-2.81%
1-year return+56.68%-12.41%
P/E ratio (TTM)115.0917.88
Forward P/E5.448.21
EPS (TTM)$0.11$0.60
Dividend yield3.79%16.78%
Annual dividend$0.48$1.80
Revenue (latest FY)$3.58B$1.18B
Revenue growth (YoY)+22.14%+21.22%
Net income (latest FY)$132.91M$142.98M
Operating margin6.40%20.84%
Net margin3.71%12.16%
52-week high$15.47$15.02
52-week low$7.68$10.15
Distance from 52-week high-18.16%-28.56%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+40.68%+54.99%
Average volume6.56M647.36K
Shares outstanding330.40M166.95M
Employees1,066840
SectorEnergyEnergy
IndustryOil & Gas ProductionOil & Gas Production

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Crescent Energy is about 2.8 times larger than Mach Natural Resources by market value ($4.98B vs $1.79B).
  • CRGY has outperformed MNR by 69.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Crescent Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (115.1x vs 17.9x trailing P/E).
  • Mach Natural Resources offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (16.78% vs 3.79%).
  • Mach Natural Resources is more profitable, keeping 12.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.7 cents for Crescent Energy.

About Crescent Energy

CRGY stock →

Crescent Energy Company engages in the exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the United States. The company's activities focused in Eagle Ford, Permian, and Uinta Basins.

Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,066 employees

About Mach Natural Resources

MNR stock →

Mach Natural Resources LP, an independent upstream oil and gas company, focuses on the acquisition, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGL) reserves. The company owns a portfolio of midstream assets, as well as owns gathering systems, processing plants.

Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 840 employees

CRGY vs MNR FAQ

Which is bigger, Crescent Energy or Mach Natural Resources?

Crescent Energy (CRGY) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.98B compared with $1.79B for Mach Natural Resources (MNR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CRGY or MNR?

CRGY returned +56.68% over the past 12 months, compared with -12.41% for MNR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CRGY or MNR?

MNR has the lower trailing P/E at 17.9, versus 115.1 for CRGY. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Crescent Energy or Mach Natural Resources?

Mach Natural Resources has the higher yield at 16.78%, compared with 3.79% for Crescent Energy.

Are Crescent Energy and Mach Natural Resources in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons