Crescent Energy (CRGY) vs Range Resources (RRC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Crescent Energy (CRGY) has outperformed Range Resources (RRC) over the past year, gaining 42.0% versus a gain of 3.1%. Range Resources is the larger company by market cap ($9.56 billion vs $4.98 billion), about 1.9 times the size. On valuation, Crescent Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (5.4x vs 10.4x for Range Resources).
Crescent Energy offers the higher dividend yield (3.79% vs 0.93%). Range Resources converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 21.1% versus 3.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CRGY | RRC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $12.66 | $40.89 |
| Market cap | $4.98B | $9.56B |
| 1-day change | -2.69% | +0.29% |
| YTD return | +55.07% | +15.63% |
| 1-year return | +42.03% | +3.08% |
| 5-year return | — | +73.86% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 115.09 | 11.30 |
| Forward P/E | 5.44 | 10.37 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.11 | $3.62 |
| Dividend yield | 3.79% | 0.93% |
| Annual dividend | $0.48 | $0.38 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.58B | $3.12B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +22.14% | +28.90% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $132.91M | $658.02M |
| Gross margin | — | 94.04% |
| Operating margin | 6.40% | — |
| Net margin | 3.71% | 21.12% |
| 52-week high | $15.47 | $48.31 |
| 52-week low | $7.68 | $32.68 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -18.16% | -15.36% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +37.99% | +11.45% |
| Average volume | 5.96M | 2.75M |
| Shares outstanding | 330.40M | 233.68M |
| Employees | 1,066 | 564 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CRGY has outperformed RRC by 38.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Crescent Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (115.1x vs 11.3x trailing P/E).
- Crescent Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.79% vs 0.93%).
- Range Resources is more profitable, keeping 21.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.7 cents for Crescent Energy.
- Range Resources grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+28.90% vs +22.14%).
About Crescent Energy
CRGY stock →Crescent Energy Company engages in the exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids in the United States. The company's activities focused in Eagle Ford, Permian, and Uinta Basins.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,066 employees
About Range Resources
RRC stock →Range Resources Corporation operates as an independent natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and oil company in the United States. The company engages in the exploration, development, and acquisition of natural gas, NGLs, and oil properties located in the Appalachian region.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 564 employees
CRGY vs RRC FAQ
Which is bigger, Crescent Energy or Range Resources?
Range Resources (RRC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $9.56B compared with $4.98B for Crescent Energy (CRGY).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CRGY or RRC?
CRGY returned +42.03% over the past 12 months, compared with +3.08% for RRC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CRGY or RRC?
RRC has the lower trailing P/E at 11.3, versus 115.1 for CRGY. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Crescent Energy or Range Resources?
Crescent Energy has the higher yield at 3.79%, compared with 0.93% for Range Resources.
Are Crescent Energy and Range Resources in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.