HF Sinclair (DINO) vs Phillips 66 (PSX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
HF Sinclair (DINO) has outperformed Phillips 66 (PSX) over the past year, gaining 130.6% versus a gain of 114.5%. Over five years, PSX leads with a +246.7% price change compared with +231.3% for DINO. Phillips 66 is the larger company by market cap ($112.90 billion vs $21.46 billion), about 5.3 times the size, while HF Sinclair is growing revenue faster (-6.0% vs -7.5%).
On valuation, HF Sinclair trades at a lower forward P/E (9.2x vs 10.5x for Phillips 66). Phillips 66 offers the higher dividend yield (1.75% vs 1.66%). Phillips 66 converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 3.3% versus 2.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | DINO | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $120.72 | $281.60 |
| Market cap | $21.46B | $112.90B |
| 1-day change | +4.40% | +3.67% |
| YTD return | +161.98% | +118.23% |
| 1-year return | +130.60% | +114.47% |
| 5-year return | +231.28% | +246.71% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 11.50 | 16.09 |
| Forward P/E | 9.16 | 10.53 |
| EPS (TTM) | $10.50 | $17.50 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 1.75% |
| Annual dividend | $2.00 | $4.94 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $26.87B | $132.38B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -5.99% | -7.53% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $579.00M | $4.40B |
| Gross margin | 8.56% | 12.30% |
| Operating margin | 3.45% | — |
| Net margin | 2.15% | 3.33% |
| 52-week high | $120.83 | $282.64 |
| 52-week low | $45.71 | $126.74 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -0.09% | -0.37% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -11.80% | -8.68% |
| Average volume | 2.74M | 2.84M |
| Shares outstanding | 177.78M | 400.94M |
| Employees | 5,165 | 12,600 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Natural Gas Distribution | Integrated oil Companies |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Phillips 66 is about 5.3 times larger than HF Sinclair by market value ($112.90B vs $21.46B).
- DINO has outperformed PSX by 16.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Phillips 66 trades at a higher earnings multiple (16.1x vs 11.5x trailing P/E).
About HF Sinclair
DINO stock →HF Sinclair Corporation operates as an independent energy company in the United States. It operates through five segments: Refining, Renewables, Marketing, Lubricants & Specialties, and Midstream.
Energy · Natural Gas Distribution · 5,165 employees
About Phillips 66
PSX stock →Phillips 66 operates as an integrated downstream energy provider in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and internationally. It operates through five segments: Midstream, Chemicals, Refining, Marketing and Specialties (M&S), and Renewable Fuels.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 12,600 employees
DINO vs PSX FAQ
Which is bigger, HF Sinclair or Phillips 66?
Phillips 66 (PSX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $112.90B compared with $21.46B for HF Sinclair (DINO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, DINO or PSX?
DINO returned +130.60% over the past 12 months, compared with +114.47% for PSX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, DINO or PSX?
DINO has the lower trailing P/E at 11.5, versus 16.1 for PSX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, HF Sinclair or Phillips 66?
Phillips 66 has the higher yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.66% for HF Sinclair.
Are HF Sinclair and Phillips 66 in the same industry?
Both are in the Energy sector, but in different industries: Natural Gas Distribution for HF Sinclair and Integrated oil Companies for Phillips 66.