MetaCap

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) vs Navios Maritime Partners (NMM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) has outperformed Navios Maritime Partners (NMM) over the past year, gaining 232.0% versus a gain of 106.0%. Okeanis Eco Tankers is the larger company by market cap ($3.69 billion vs $2.66 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Navios Maritime Partners is growing revenue faster (+0.8% vs -0.4%). On valuation, Navios Maritime Partners trades at a lower forward P/E (4.9x vs 15.9x for Okeanis Eco Tankers).

Okeanis Eco Tankers offers the higher dividend yield (10.11% vs 0.24%). Okeanis Eco Tankers converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 31.4% versus 21.2%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ECO+231.95%NMM+106.02%
+244%+115%-14%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
ECO+285.47%NMM+303.64%
+325%+142%-41%
Aug 14, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ECO versus NMM key metrics
MetricECONMM
Share price$94.44$91.99
Market cap$3.69B$2.66B
1-day change+7.27%+1.33%
YTD return+179.08%+75.45%
1-year return+231.95%+106.02%
5-year return—+236.10%
P/E ratio (TTM)8.746.02
Forward P/E15.934.90
EPS (TTM)$10.80$15.29
Dividend yield10.11%0.24%
Annual dividend$9.55$0.22
Revenue (latest FY)$391.55M$1.34B
Revenue growth (YoY)-0.43%+0.76%
Net income (latest FY)$122.95M$285.33M
Gross margin—90.50%
Operating margin41.51%—
Net margin31.40%21.23%
52-week high$94.98$95.00
52-week low$28.10$43.02
Distance from 52-week high-0.57%-3.17%
Analyst consensusstrong_buystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+5.89%+11.97%
Average volume621.54K148.98K
Shares outstanding39.04M28.30M
Employees14—
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryMarine TransportationMarine Transportation

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ECO has outperformed NMM by 125.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Okeanis Eco Tankers trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.7x vs 6.0x trailing P/E).
  • Okeanis Eco Tankers offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.11% vs 0.24%).
  • Okeanis Eco Tankers is more profitable, keeping 31.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 21.2 cents for Navios Maritime Partners.

About Okeanis Eco Tankers

ECO stock →

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp., a shipping company, owns and operates tanker vessels worldwide. It operates a fleet of 16 tanker vessels comprising eight modern Suezmax tankers and eight modern VLCC tankers focusing on the transportation of crude oil.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 14 employees

About Navios Maritime Partners

NMM stock →

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. owns and operates dry cargo and tanker vessels in Asia, Europe, North America, and Australia.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation

ECO vs NMM FAQ

Which is bigger, Okeanis Eco Tankers or Navios Maritime Partners?

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.69B compared with $2.66B for Navios Maritime Partners (NMM).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ECO or NMM?

ECO returned +231.95% over the past 12 months, compared with +106.02% for NMM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ECO or NMM?

NMM has the lower trailing P/E at 6.0, versus 8.7 for ECO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Okeanis Eco Tankers or Navios Maritime Partners?

Okeanis Eco Tankers has the higher yield at 10.11%, compared with 0.24% for Navios Maritime Partners.

Are Okeanis Eco Tankers and Navios Maritime Partners in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons