Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) vs TORM (TRMD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) has outperformed TORM (TRMD) over the past year, gaining 212.2% versus a gain of 90.9%. TORM is the larger company by market cap ($4.11 billion vs $3.69 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Okeanis Eco Tankers is growing revenue faster (-0.4% vs -14.1%). On valuation, TORM trades at a lower forward P/E (9.3x vs 15.9x for Okeanis Eco Tankers).
TORM offers the higher dividend yield (11.03% vs 10.11%). Okeanis Eco Tankers converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 31.4% versus 21.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ECO | TRMD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $94.44 | $40.06 |
| Market cap | $3.69B | $4.11B |
| 1-day change | +7.27% | +2.93% |
| YTD return | +160.17% | +98.77% |
| 1-year return | +212.20% | +90.88% |
| 5-year return | — | +382.88% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.74 | 6.60 |
| Forward P/E | 15.93 | 9.27 |
| EPS (TTM) | $10.80 | $6.07 |
| Dividend yield | 10.11% | 11.03% |
| Annual dividend | $9.55 | $4.42 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $391.55M | $1.34B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.43% | -14.09% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $122.95M | $285.30M |
| Operating margin | 41.51% | 26.60% |
| Net margin | 31.40% | 21.30% |
| 52-week high | $94.98 | $41.55 |
| 52-week low | $28.10 | $19.30 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -0.57% | -3.57% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +5.89% | +3.59% |
| Average volume | 615.41K | 1.22M |
| Shares outstanding | 39.04M | 102.71M |
| Employees | 14 | 588 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Marine Transportation | Marine Transportation |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ECO has outperformed TRMD by 121.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Okeanis Eco Tankers trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.7x vs 6.6x trailing P/E).
- Okeanis Eco Tankers is more profitable, keeping 31.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 21.3 cents for TORM.
- Okeanis Eco Tankers grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (-0.43% vs -14.09%).
About Okeanis Eco Tankers
ECO stock →Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp., a shipping company, owns and operates tanker vessels worldwide. It operates a fleet of 16 tanker vessels comprising eight modern Suezmax tankers and eight modern VLCC tankers focusing on the transportation of crude oil.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 14 employees
About TORM
TRMD stock →TORM plc, a shipping company, owns and operates a fleet of product tankers in the United Kingdom and internationally. It operates in two segments, Tanker and Marine Engineering.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 588 employees
ECO vs TRMD FAQ
Which is bigger, Okeanis Eco Tankers or TORM?
TORM (TRMD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.11B compared with $3.69B for Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ECO or TRMD?
ECO returned +212.20% over the past 12 months, compared with +90.88% for TRMD (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ECO or TRMD?
TRMD has the lower trailing P/E at 6.6, versus 8.7 for ECO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Okeanis Eco Tankers or TORM?
TORM has the higher yield at 11.03%, compared with 10.11% for Okeanis Eco Tankers.
Are Okeanis Eco Tankers and TORM in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.