MetaCap

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) vs Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) has outperformed Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK) over the past year, gaining 212.2% versus a gain of 61.2%. Okeanis Eco Tankers is the larger company by market cap ($3.69 billion vs $3.54 billion), about 1.0 times the size. On valuation, Star Bulk Carriers trades at a lower forward P/E (8.7x vs 15.9x for Okeanis Eco Tankers).

Okeanis Eco Tankers offers the higher dividend yield (10.11% vs 6.17%). Okeanis Eco Tankers converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 31.4% versus 8.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ECO+212.20%SBLK+61.18%
+225%+103%-20%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ECO+259.35%SBLK+61.71%
+274%+115%-43%
Aug 14, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ECO versus SBLK key metrics
MetricECOSBLK
Share price$94.44$30.47
Market cap$3.69B$3.54B
1-day change+7.27%+2.63%
YTD return+160.17%+54.47%
1-year return+212.20%+61.18%
5-year return—+34.53%
P/E ratio (TTM)8.7411.95
Forward P/E15.938.65
EPS (TTM)$10.80$2.55
Dividend yield10.11%6.17%
Annual dividend$9.55$1.88
Revenue (latest FY)$391.55M$1.04B
Revenue growth (YoY)-0.43%-17.62%
Net income (latest FY)$122.95M$84.17M
Operating margin41.51%13.13%
Net margin31.40%8.07%
52-week high$94.98$32.88
52-week low$28.10$16.72
Distance from 52-week high-0.57%-7.33%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+5.89%+13.03%
Average volume615.41K1.59M
Shares outstanding39.04M116.07M
Employees14294
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryMarine TransportationMarine Transportation

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ECO has outperformed SBLK by 151.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Star Bulk Carriers trades at a higher earnings multiple (11.9x vs 8.7x trailing P/E).
  • Okeanis Eco Tankers offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.11% vs 6.17%).
  • Okeanis Eco Tankers is more profitable, keeping 31.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 8.1 cents for Star Bulk Carriers.
  • Okeanis Eco Tankers grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (-0.43% vs -17.62%).

About Okeanis Eco Tankers

ECO stock →

Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp., a shipping company, owns and operates tanker vessels worldwide. It operates a fleet of 16 tanker vessels comprising eight modern Suezmax tankers and eight modern VLCC tankers focusing on the transportation of crude oil.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 14 employees

About Star Bulk Carriers

SBLK stock →

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. provides international seaborne transportation services for dry bulk commodities.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 294 employees

ECO vs SBLK FAQ

Which is bigger, Okeanis Eco Tankers or Star Bulk Carriers?

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.69B compared with $3.54B for Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ECO or SBLK?

ECO returned +212.20% over the past 12 months, compared with +61.18% for SBLK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ECO or SBLK?

ECO has the lower trailing P/E at 8.7, versus 11.9 for SBLK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Okeanis Eco Tankers or Star Bulk Carriers?

Okeanis Eco Tankers has the higher yield at 10.11%, compared with 6.17% for Star Bulk Carriers.

Are Okeanis Eco Tankers and Star Bulk Carriers in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons