MetaCap

Estee Lauder Companies (EL) vs Procter & Gamble (PG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Estee Lauder Companies (EL) has outperformed Procter & Gamble (PG) over the past year, gaining 2.4% versus a loss of 2.6%. Over five years, PG leads with a +2.8% price change compared with -70.4% for EL. Procter & Gamble is the larger company by market cap ($343.34 billion vs $34.22 billion), about 10.0 times the size, while Estee Lauder Companies is growing revenue faster (+5.0% vs +3.3%).

On valuation, Procter & Gamble trades at a lower forward P/E (20.0x vs 24.1x for Estee Lauder Companies). Procter & Gamble offers the higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 1.48%). Procter & Gamble converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.4% versus 1.2%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EL+7.03%PG-1.26%
+38%+5%-27%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
EL-69.56%PG+4.78%
+32%-28%-88%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EL versus PG key metrics
MetricELPG
Share price$94.45$147.82
Market cap$34.22B$343.34B
1-day change+1.17%-0.40%
YTD return-9.39%+3.63%
1-year return+2.38%-2.64%
5-year return-70.42%+2.83%
P/E ratio (TTM)188.9022.33
Forward P/E24.0819.99
EPS (TTM)$0.50$6.62
Dividend yield1.48%2.88%
Annual dividend$1.40$4.26
Revenue (latest FY)$15.05B$87.03B
Revenue growth (YoY)+5.05%+3.26%
Net income (latest FY)$182.00M$16.05B
Gross margin75.50%50.18%
Operating margin5.18%22.69%
Net margin1.21%18.44%
52-week high$121.64$167.25
52-week low$66.22$137.62
Distance from 52-week high-22.35%-11.62%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+13.65%+8.77%
Average volume2.96M8.60M
Shares outstanding247.82M2.32B
Employees37,950104,000
SectorConsumer DefensiveConsumer Defensive
IndustryHousehold & Personal ProductsHousehold & Personal Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Procter & Gamble is about 10.0 times larger than Estee Lauder Companies by market value ($343.34B vs $34.22B).
  • Estee Lauder Companies trades at a higher earnings multiple (188.9x vs 22.3x trailing P/E).
  • Procter & Gamble offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 1.48%).
  • Procter & Gamble is more profitable, keeping 18.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.2 cents for Estee Lauder Companies.

About Estee Lauder Companies

EL stock →

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. manufactures, markets, and sells skin care, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products worldwide.

Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 37,950 employees

About Procter & Gamble

PG stock →

The Procter & Gamble Company provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide. It operates through five segments: Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine & Family Care.

Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 104,000 employees

EL vs PG FAQ

Which is bigger, Estee Lauder Companies or Procter & Gamble?

Procter & Gamble (PG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $343.34B compared with $34.22B for Estee Lauder Companies (EL).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EL or PG?

EL returned +2.38% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.64% for PG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EL or PG?

PG has the lower trailing P/E at 22.3, versus 188.9 for EL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Estee Lauder Companies or Procter & Gamble?

Procter & Gamble has the higher yield at 2.88%, compared with 1.48% for Estee Lauder Companies.

Are Estee Lauder Companies and Procter & Gamble in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector.

More comparisons