Ferrovial N.V. (FER) vs Sterling Infrastructure (STRL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) has outperformed Ferrovial N.V. (FER) over the past year, gaining 53.2% versus a loss of 16.2%. Over five years, STRL leads with a +2212.3% price change compared with +72.1% for FER. Ferrovial N.V. is the larger company by market cap ($36.42 billion vs $16.34 billion), about 2.2 times the size.
On valuation, Sterling Infrastructure trades at a lower forward P/E (21.0x vs 38.0x for Ferrovial N.V.). Ferrovial N.V. pays a dividend yielding 1.10%, while Sterling Infrastructure does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FER | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $50.60 | $534.13 |
| Market cap | $36.42B | $16.34B |
| 1-day change | -1.67% | -5.24% |
| YTD return | -21.68% | +74.42% |
| 1-year return | -16.17% | +53.23% |
| 5-year return | +72.11% | +2212.25% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 28.27 | 38.48 |
| Forward P/E | 37.97 | 21.03 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.79 | $13.88 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.558 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $2.49B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +17.69% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $290.15M |
| Gross margin | — | 22.98% |
| Operating margin | — | 16.30% |
| Net margin | — | 11.65% |
| 52-week high | $74.79 | $1,005.68 |
| 52-week low | $50.36 | $281.58 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -32.34% | -46.89% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +43.75% | +58.28% |
| Average volume | 1.53M | 652.16K |
| Shares outstanding | 719.79M | 30.59M |
| Employees | 22,359 | 6,200 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Military/Government/Technical | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Ferrovial N.V. is about 2.2 times larger than Sterling Infrastructure by market value ($36.42B vs $16.34B).
- STRL has outperformed FER by 69.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Sterling Infrastructure trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.5x vs 28.3x trailing P/E).
- Ferrovial N.V. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.10% vs 0.00%).
About Ferrovial N.V.
FER stock →Ferrovial N.V., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. It operates through four segments: Construction, Highways, Airports, and Energy.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 22,359 employees
About Sterling Infrastructure
STRL stock →Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. engages in the provision of e-infrastructure, transportation, and building solutions in the United States.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 6,200 employees
FER vs STRL FAQ
Which is bigger, Ferrovial N.V. or Sterling Infrastructure?
Ferrovial N.V. (FER) is larger, with a market capitalization of $36.42B compared with $16.34B for Sterling Infrastructure (STRL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FER or STRL?
STRL returned +53.23% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.17% for FER (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FER or STRL?
FER has the lower trailing P/E at 28.3, versus 38.5 for STRL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Ferrovial N.V. or Sterling Infrastructure?
Ferrovial N.V. pays a dividend yielding 1.10%, while Sterling Infrastructure does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Ferrovial N.V. and Sterling Infrastructure in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Military/Government/Technical industry within the Industrials sector.