Fluor (FLR) vs Sterling Infrastructure (STRL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) has outperformed Fluor (FLR) over the past year, gaining 53.2% versus a gain of 19.2%. Over five years, STRL leads with a +2212.3% price change compared with +192.5% for FLR. Sterling Infrastructure is the larger company by market cap ($16.34 billion vs $6.84 billion), about 2.4 times the size.
On valuation, Fluor trades at a lower forward P/E (15.2x vs 21.0x for Sterling Infrastructure). Sterling Infrastructure converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.7% versus -0.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FLR | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $51.14 | $534.13 |
| Market cap | $6.84B | $16.34B |
| 1-day change | -1.65% | -5.24% |
| YTD return | +29.04% | +74.42% |
| 1-year return | +19.15% | +53.23% |
| 5-year return | +192.48% | +2212.25% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 38.48 |
| Forward P/E | 15.19 | 21.03 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-11.90 | $13.88 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $15.50B | $2.49B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -4.98% | +17.69% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-51.00M | $290.15M |
| Gross margin | -0.77% | 22.98% |
| Operating margin | -2.44% | 16.30% |
| Net margin | -0.33% | 11.65% |
| 52-week high | $58.35 | $1,005.68 |
| 52-week low | $39.33 | $281.58 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.36% | -46.89% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +20.63% | +58.28% |
| Average volume | 2.41M | 652.16K |
| Shares outstanding | 133.74M | 30.59M |
| Employees | 22,995 | 6,200 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Military/Government/Technical | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Sterling Infrastructure is about 2.4 times larger than Fluor by market value ($16.34B vs $6.84B).
- STRL has outperformed FLR by 34.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Sterling Infrastructure is more profitable, keeping 11.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -0.3 cents for Fluor.
- Sterling Infrastructure grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+17.69% vs -4.98%).
About Fluor
FLR stock →Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC); fabrication and modularization; and project management services worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 22,995 employees
About Sterling Infrastructure
STRL stock →Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. engages in the provision of e-infrastructure, transportation, and building solutions in the United States.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 6,200 employees
FLR vs STRL FAQ
Which is bigger, Fluor or Sterling Infrastructure?
Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $16.34B compared with $6.84B for Fluor (FLR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FLR or STRL?
STRL returned +53.23% over the past 12 months, compared with +19.15% for FLR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Fluor and Sterling Infrastructure in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Military/Government/Technical industry within the Industrials sector.