MetaCap

Financial Institutions (FISI) vs Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) has outperformed Financial Institutions (FISI) over the past year, gaining 55.9% versus a gain of 41.6%. Over five years, PGC leads with a +30.4% price change compared with +22.4% for FISI. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is the larger company by market cap ($769.6 million vs $762.8 million), about 1.0 times the size.

On valuation, Financial Institutions trades at a lower forward P/E (9.0x vs 9.1x for Peapack-Gladstone Financial). Financial Institutions offers the higher dividend yield (3.25% vs 0.46%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

FISI+41.59%PGC+55.87%
+78%+31%-15%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
FISI+22.15%PGC+27.90%
+46%-5%-56%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

FISI versus PGC key metrics
MetricFISIPGC
Share price$38.71$43.41
Market cap$762.83M$769.57M
1-day change-1.45%-1.74%
YTD return+24.19%+55.87%
1-year return+41.59%+55.87%
5-year return+22.38%+30.40%
P/E ratio (TTM)9.6115.39
Forward P/E9.009.05
EPS (TTM)$4.03$2.82
Dividend yield3.25%0.46%
Annual dividend$1.26$0.20
52-week high$42.97$49.14
52-week low$25.61$24.71
Distance from 52-week high-9.91%-11.66%
Analyst consensusnonenone
Avg. price target upside+16.25%+29.00%
Average volume144.84K165.87K
Shares outstanding19.71M17.73M
Employees631682
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryMajor BanksCommercial Banks

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • PGC has outperformed FISI by 14.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Peapack-Gladstone Financial trades at a higher earnings multiple (15.4x vs 9.6x trailing P/E).
  • Financial Institutions offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.25% vs 0.46%).

About Financial Institutions

FISI stock →

Financial Institutions, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides banking and financial services to consumer, commercial, and municipal customers in New York. The company provides checking and savings account programs, including money market accounts, certificates of deposit, sweep investments, and individual retirement and other qualified plan accounts, as well as NOW accounts.

Finance · Major Banks · 631 employees

About Peapack-Gladstone Financial

PGC stock →

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation operates as the bank holding company for Peapack Private Bank & Trust that provides private banking and wealth management services in the United States. The company operates in two segments, Banking and Wealth Management.

Finance · Commercial Banks · 682 employees

FISI vs PGC FAQ

Which is bigger, Financial Institutions or Peapack-Gladstone Financial?

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $769.57M compared with $762.83M for Financial Institutions (FISI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, FISI or PGC?

PGC returned +55.87% over the past 12 months, compared with +41.59% for FISI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, FISI or PGC?

FISI has the lower trailing P/E at 9.6, versus 15.4 for PGC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Financial Institutions or Peapack-Gladstone Financial?

Financial Institutions has the higher yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.46% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Are Financial Institutions and Peapack-Gladstone Financial in the same industry?

Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Major Banks for Financial Institutions and Commercial Banks for Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

More comparisons