Gold Fields (GFI) vs D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater (SBSW)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Gold Fields (GFI) has outperformed D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater (SBSW) over the past year, losing 17.4% versus a loss of 18.1%. Over five years, GFI leads with a +282.7% price change compared with -34.9% for SBSW. Gold Fields is the larger company by market cap ($31.95 billion vs $7.17 billion), about 4.5 times the size.
On valuation, D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater trades at a lower forward P/E (2.9x vs 7.1x for Gold Fields). D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater offers the higher dividend yield (33.50% vs 5.96%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GFI | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $35.86 | $9.91 |
| Market cap | $31.95B | $7.17B |
| 1-day change | +2.31% | +2.38% |
| YTD return | -17.87% | -30.46% |
| 1-year return | -17.35% | -18.10% |
| 5-year return | +282.71% | -34.93% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.35 | 8.33 |
| Forward P/E | 7.12 | 2.90 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.88 | $1.19 |
| Dividend yield | 5.96% | 33.50% |
| Annual dividend | $2.14 | $3.32 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.20B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +15.57% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.25B | — |
| Gross margin | 45.33% | — |
| Net margin | 23.93% | — |
| 52-week high | $61.64 | $21.29 |
| 52-week low | $31.11 | $7.87 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -41.82% | -53.45% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +35.72% | +34.91% |
| Average volume | 3.74M | 5.15M |
| Shares outstanding | 890.90M | 707.64M |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Precious Metals | Precious Metals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Gold Fields is about 4.5 times larger than D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater by market value ($31.95B vs $7.17B).
- D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (33.50% vs 5.96%).
About Gold Fields
GFI stock →Gold Fields Limited operates as a gold producer with reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. It also explores for gold, copper and silver deposits.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
About D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater
SBSW stock →Sibanye Stillwater Limited, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a precious metals mining company in South Africa, the United States, Europe, and Australia. The company produces platinum group metals (PGMs), platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, iridium, gold, lithium, zinc, nickel, copper, and silver.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
GFI vs SBSW FAQ
Which is bigger, Gold Fields or D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater?
Gold Fields (GFI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $31.95B compared with $7.17B for D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater (SBSW).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GFI or SBSW?
GFI returned -17.35% over the past 12 months, compared with -18.10% for SBSW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GFI or SBSW?
GFI has the lower trailing P/E at 7.3, versus 8.3 for SBSW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Gold Fields or D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater?
D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater has the higher yield at 33.50%, compared with 5.96% for Gold Fields.
Are Gold Fields and D/B/A Sibanye-Stillwater in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.