Gold Fields (GFI) vs Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) has outperformed Gold Fields (GFI) over the past year, gaining 23.4% versus a loss of 16.2%. Over five years, GFI leads with a +274.1% price change compared with +226.0% for WPM. Wheaton Precious Metals is the larger company by market cap ($60.67 billion vs $31.78 billion), about 1.9 times the size.
On valuation, Gold Fields trades at a lower forward P/E (7.1x vs 26.8x for Wheaton Precious Metals). Gold Fields offers the higher dividend yield (5.99% vs 0.54%). Wheaton Precious Metals converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 63.6% versus 23.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GFI | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $35.67 | $133.58 |
| Market cap | $31.78B | $60.67B |
| 1-day change | +1.80% | -0.06% |
| YTD return | -19.72% | +13.76% |
| 1-year return | -16.25% | +23.42% |
| 5-year return | +274.07% | +225.99% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.31 | 29.62 |
| Forward P/E | 7.08 | 26.85 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.88 | $4.51 |
| Dividend yield | 5.99% | 0.54% |
| Annual dividend | $2.14 | $0.72 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.20B | $2.31B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +15.57% | +80.18% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.25B | $1.47B |
| Gross margin | 45.33% | 72.22% |
| Operating margin | — | 68.33% |
| Net margin | 23.93% | 63.58% |
| 52-week high | $61.64 | $165.76 |
| 52-week low | $31.11 | $92.57 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -42.13% | -19.41% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +36.45% | +33.11% |
| Average volume | 3.74M | 1.98M |
| Shares outstanding | 890.90M | 454.16M |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Precious Metals | Precious Metals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WPM has outperformed GFI by 39.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Wheaton Precious Metals trades at a higher earnings multiple (29.6x vs 7.3x trailing P/E).
- Gold Fields offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.99% vs 0.54%).
- Wheaton Precious Metals is more profitable, keeping 63.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 23.9 cents for Gold Fields.
- Wheaton Precious Metals grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+80.18% vs +15.57%).
About Gold Fields
GFI stock →Gold Fields Limited operates as a gold producer with reserves and resources in South Africa, Ghana, Australia, Peru, Canada, and Chile. It also explores for gold, copper and silver deposits.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
About Wheaton Precious Metals
WPM stock →Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. operates as a precious metal streaming company.
Basic Materials · Precious Metals
GFI vs WPM FAQ
Which is bigger, Gold Fields or Wheaton Precious Metals?
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $60.67B compared with $31.78B for Gold Fields (GFI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GFI or WPM?
WPM returned +23.42% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.25% for GFI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GFI or WPM?
GFI has the lower trailing P/E at 7.3, versus 29.6 for WPM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Gold Fields or Wheaton Precious Metals?
Gold Fields has the higher yield at 5.99%, compared with 0.54% for Wheaton Precious Metals.
Are Gold Fields and Wheaton Precious Metals in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Precious Metals industry within the Basic Materials sector.