Acushnet (GOLF) vs Hasbro (HAS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Hasbro (HAS) has outperformed Acushnet (GOLF) over the past year, gaining 21.3% versus a gain of 0.4%. Over five years, GOLF leads with a +69.2% price change compared with -1.9% for HAS. Hasbro is the larger company by market cap ($12.80 billion vs $4.71 billion), about 2.7 times the size.
On valuation, Hasbro trades at a lower forward P/E (14.0x vs 19.0x for Acushnet). Hasbro offers the higher dividend yield (3.09% vs 1.22%). Acushnet converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.4% versus -6.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GOLF | HAS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $80.57 | $90.75 |
| Market cap | $4.71B | $12.80B |
| 1-day change | -2.88% | -0.31% |
| YTD return | +0.94% | +10.67% |
| 1-year return | +0.36% | +21.27% |
| 5-year return | +69.19% | -1.86% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 21.89 | 16.23 |
| Forward P/E | 19.02 | 13.96 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.68 | $5.59 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 3.09% |
| Annual dividend | $0.98 | $2.80 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.56B | $5.37B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.14% | +13.06% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $188.54M | $-322.40M |
| Gross margin | 47.73% | 75.84% |
| Operating margin | 11.70% | 0.21% |
| Net margin | 7.37% | -6.01% |
| 52-week high | $119.65 | $106.98 |
| 52-week low | $75.16 | $69.50 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -32.66% | -15.17% |
| Analyst consensus | none | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +23.71% | +21.90% |
| Average volume | 355.61K | 1.89M |
| Shares outstanding | 58.41M | 141.04M |
| Employees | 7,300 | 4,520 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Recreational Games/Products/Toys | Recreational Games/Products/Toys |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Hasbro is about 2.7 times larger than Acushnet by market value ($12.80B vs $4.71B).
- HAS has outperformed GOLF by 20.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Acushnet trades at a higher earnings multiple (21.9x vs 16.2x trailing P/E).
- Hasbro offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.09% vs 1.22%).
- Acushnet is more profitable, keeping 7.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -6.0 cents for Hasbro.
- Hasbro grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+13.06% vs +4.14%).
About Acushnet
GOLF stock →Acushnet Holdings Corp. designs, develops, manufactures, and distributes golf products in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Japan, Korea, and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Recreational Games/Products/Toys · 7,300 employees
About Hasbro
HAS stock →Hasbro, Inc. operates as a toy and game company in the United States, Europe, Canada, Mexico, Latin America, Australia, China, and Hong Kong.
Consumer Discretionary · Recreational Games/Products/Toys · 4,520 employees
GOLF vs HAS FAQ
Which is bigger, Acushnet or Hasbro?
Hasbro (HAS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.80B compared with $4.71B for Acushnet (GOLF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GOLF or HAS?
HAS returned +21.27% over the past 12 months, compared with +0.36% for GOLF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GOLF or HAS?
HAS has the lower trailing P/E at 16.2, versus 21.9 for GOLF. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Acushnet or Hasbro?
Hasbro has the higher yield at 3.09%, compared with 1.22% for Acushnet.
Are Acushnet and Hasbro in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Recreational Games/Products/Toys industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.