Garrett Motion (GTX) vs LKQ (LKQ)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Garrett Motion (GTX) has outperformed LKQ (LKQ) over the past year, gaining 97.6% versus a loss of 25.9%. Over five years, GTX leads with a +260.1% price change compared with -60.2% for LKQ. LKQ is the larger company by market cap ($5.53 billion vs $4.89 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Garrett Motion is growing revenue faster (+3.1% vs -1.2%).
On valuation, LKQ trades at a lower forward P/E (7.1x vs 11.5x for Garrett Motion). LKQ offers the higher dividend yield (5.49% vs 1.14%). Garrett Motion converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.6% versus 4.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GTX | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $26.24 | $21.84 |
| Market cap | $4.89B | $5.53B |
| 1-day change | +1.90% | -0.77% |
| YTD return | +47.73% | -27.12% |
| 1-year return | +97.62% | -25.89% |
| 5-year return | +260.14% | -60.16% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.42 | 12.13 |
| Forward P/E | 11.49 | 7.12 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.82 | $1.80 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 5.49% |
| Annual dividend | $0.30 | $1.20 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.58B | $13.65B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.14% | -1.24% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $310.00M | $608.00M |
| Gross margin | 20.40% | 38.57% |
| Operating margin | — | 7.27% |
| Net margin | 8.65% | 4.45% |
| 52-week high | $36.25 | $37.13 |
| 52-week low | $12.26 | $21.17 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -27.61% | -41.18% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +37.20% | +47.12% |
| Average volume | 2.52M | 3.28M |
| Shares outstanding | 186.49M | 253.00M |
| Employees | 6,300 | 44,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Auto Parts:O.E.M. | Motor Vehicles |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- GTX has outperformed LKQ by 123.5 percentage points over the past year.
- LKQ offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.49% vs 1.14%).
About Garrett Motion
GTX stock →Garrett Motion Inc. designs, manufactures, and sells turbocharging, air and fluid compression, and high-speed electric motor technologies to original equipment manufacturers and independent aftermarket distributors in the mobility and industrial fields.
Consumer Discretionary · Auto Parts:O.E.M. · 6,300 employees
About LKQ
LKQ stock →LKQ Corporation engages in the distribution of replacement parts, components, and systems used in the repair and maintenance of vehicles and specialty vehicle aftermarket products and accessories. The company operates through four segments: Wholesale-North America, Europe, Specialty, and Self Service.
Consumer Discretionary · Motor Vehicles · 44,000 employees
GTX vs LKQ FAQ
Which is bigger, Garrett Motion or LKQ?
LKQ (LKQ) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.53B compared with $4.89B for Garrett Motion (GTX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GTX or LKQ?
GTX returned +97.62% over the past 12 months, compared with -25.89% for LKQ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GTX or LKQ?
LKQ has the lower trailing P/E at 12.1, versus 14.4 for GTX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Garrett Motion or LKQ?
LKQ has the higher yield at 5.49%, compared with 1.14% for Garrett Motion.
Are Garrett Motion and LKQ in the same industry?
Both are in the Consumer Discretionary sector, but in different industries: Auto Parts:O.E.M. for Garrett Motion and Motor Vehicles for LKQ.