MetaCap

International Seaways (INSW) vs South Bow (SOBO)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

International Seaways (INSW) has outperformed South Bow (SOBO) over the past year, gaining 163.7% versus a gain of 16.6%. South Bow is the larger company by market cap ($7.06 billion vs $6.03 billion), about 1.2 times the size. On valuation, International Seaways trades at a lower forward P/E (12.7x vs 17.4x for South Bow).

South Bow offers the higher dividend yield (5.91% vs 0.39%). International Seaways converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 36.7% versus 21.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

INSW+163.68%SOBO+16.56%
+172%+76%-21%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
INSW+118.58%SOBO+51.13%
+127%+36%-54%
Sep 30, 20245 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

INSW versus SOBO key metrics
MetricINSWSOBO
Share price$121.82$33.84
Market cap$6.03B$7.06B
1-day change+4.17%+1.41%
YTD return+140.87%+21.48%
1-year return+163.68%+16.56%
5-year return+585.46%—
P/E ratio (TTM)7.7915.38
Forward P/E12.7417.43
EPS (TTM)$15.64$2.20
Dividend yield0.39%5.91%
Annual dividend$0.48$2.00
Revenue (latest FY)$843.30M$1.99B
Revenue growth (YoY)-11.38%-6.32%
Net income (latest FY)$309.26M$433.00M
Gross margin—84.24%
Operating margin40.96%—
Net margin36.67%21.80%
52-week high$121.82$39.02
52-week low$42.26$25.02
Distance from 52-week high0.00%-13.27%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside-7.51%+4.73%
Average volume622.41K619.81K
Shares outstanding49.53M208.59M
Employees2,837—
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryEnergy
IndustryMarine TransportationNatural Gas Distribution

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • INSW has outperformed SOBO by 147.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • South Bow trades at a higher earnings multiple (15.4x vs 7.8x trailing P/E).
  • South Bow offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.91% vs 0.39%).
  • International Seaways is more profitable, keeping 36.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 21.8 cents for South Bow.
  • South Bow grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (-6.32% vs -11.38%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: International Seaways in Consumer Discretionary and South Bow in Energy.

About International Seaways

INSW stock →

International Seaways, Inc. owns and operates a fleet of oceangoing vessels for the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in the international flag trade.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 2,837 employees

About South Bow

SOBO stock →

South Bow Corporation operates as an energy infrastructure company. It operates through three segments: Keystone Pipeline System, Marketing, and Intra-Alberta & Other.

Energy · Natural Gas Distribution

INSW vs SOBO FAQ

Which is bigger, International Seaways or South Bow?

South Bow (SOBO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.06B compared with $6.03B for International Seaways (INSW).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, INSW or SOBO?

INSW returned +163.68% over the past 12 months, compared with +16.56% for SOBO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, INSW or SOBO?

INSW has the lower trailing P/E at 7.8, versus 15.4 for SOBO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, International Seaways or South Bow?

South Bow has the higher yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.39% for International Seaways.

Are International Seaways and South Bow in the same industry?

No. International Seaways is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while South Bow is in Energy.

More comparisons