MetaCap

Golar Lng (GLNG) vs International Seaways (INSW)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

International Seaways (INSW) has outperformed Golar Lng (GLNG) over the past year, gaining 176.2% versus a gain of 26.7%. Over five years, INSW leads with a +614.1% price change compared with +257.6% for GLNG. International Seaways is the larger company by market cap ($6.03 billion vs $4.94 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Golar Lng is growing revenue faster (+51.1% vs -11.4%).

On valuation, International Seaways trades at a lower forward P/E (12.7x vs 77.2x for Golar Lng). Golar Lng offers the higher dividend yield (2.07% vs 0.39%). International Seaways converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 36.7% versus 16.7%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

GLNG+26.72%INSW+176.17%
+185%+84%-17%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
GLNG+257.61%INSW+608.67%
+640%+294%-51%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

GLNG versus INSW key metrics
MetricGLNGINSW
Share price$48.42$121.82
Market cap$4.94B$6.03B
1-day change-1.47%+4.17%
YTD return+30.13%+150.92%
1-year return+26.72%+176.17%
5-year return+257.61%+614.07%
P/E ratio (TTM)33.167.79
Forward P/E77.1712.74
EPS (TTM)$1.46$15.64
Dividend yield2.07%0.39%
Annual dividend$1.00$0.48
Revenue (latest FY)$393.52M$843.30M
Revenue growth (YoY)+51.14%-11.38%
Net income (latest FY)$65.68M$309.26M
Operating margin25.34%40.96%
Net margin16.69%36.67%
52-week high$57.79$121.82
52-week low$35.02$42.26
Distance from 52-week high-16.21%0.00%
Analyst consensusstrong_buystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+36.89%-7.51%
Average volume1.30M630.14K
Shares outstanding102.10M49.53M
Employees5002,837
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryMarine TransportationMarine Transportation

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • INSW has outperformed GLNG by 149.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Golar Lng trades at a higher earnings multiple (33.2x vs 7.8x trailing P/E).
  • Golar Lng offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.07% vs 0.39%).
  • International Seaways is more profitable, keeping 36.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 16.7 cents for Golar Lng.
  • Golar Lng grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+51.14% vs -11.38%).

About Golar Lng

GLNG stock →

Golar LNG Limited designs, converts, owns, and operates marine infrastructure for the liquefaction of natural gas. The company operates in two segments, FLNG, and Corporate and Other.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 500 employees

About International Seaways

INSW stock →

International Seaways, Inc. owns and operates a fleet of oceangoing vessels for the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in the international flag trade.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 2,837 employees

GLNG vs INSW FAQ

Which is bigger, Golar Lng or International Seaways?

International Seaways (INSW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.03B compared with $4.94B for Golar Lng (GLNG).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, GLNG or INSW?

INSW returned +176.17% over the past 12 months, compared with +26.72% for GLNG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, GLNG or INSW?

INSW has the lower trailing P/E at 7.8, versus 33.2 for GLNG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Golar Lng or International Seaways?

Golar Lng has the higher yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.39% for International Seaways.

Are Golar Lng and International Seaways in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons