Interparfums (IPAR) vs Procter & Gamble (PG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Interparfums (IPAR) has outperformed Procter & Gamble (PG) over the past year, gaining 18.3% versus a loss of 3.1%. Over five years, IPAR leads with a +39.8% price change compared with +2.4% for PG. Procter & Gamble is the larger company by market cap ($343.34 billion vs $3.55 billion), about 96.6 times the size.
On valuation, Procter & Gamble trades at a lower forward P/E (20.0x vs 21.3x for Interparfums). Interparfums offers the higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 2.88%). Procter & Gamble converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.4% versus 11.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | IPAR | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $111.00 | $147.82 |
| Market cap | $3.55B | $343.34B |
| 1-day change | -1.64% | -0.40% |
| YTD return | +30.85% | +3.15% |
| 1-year return | +18.32% | -3.09% |
| 5-year return | +39.82% | +2.35% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 21.18 | 22.33 |
| Forward P/E | 21.33 | 19.99 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.24 | $6.62 |
| Dividend yield | 2.88% | 2.88% |
| Annual dividend | $3.20 | $4.26 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.49B | $87.03B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.49% | +3.26% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $168.39M | $16.05B |
| Gross margin | 63.64% | 50.18% |
| Operating margin | 18.16% | 22.69% |
| Net margin | 11.31% | 18.44% |
| 52-week high | $129.29 | $167.25 |
| 52-week low | $77.21 | $137.62 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.15% | -11.62% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +13.96% | +8.77% |
| Average volume | 242.20K | 8.60M |
| Shares outstanding | 32.03M | 2.32B |
| Employees | 662 | 104,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Package Goods/Cosmetics | Package Goods/Cosmetics |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Procter & Gamble is about 96.6 times larger than Interparfums by market value ($343.34B vs $3.55B).
- IPAR has outperformed PG by 21.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Procter & Gamble is more profitable, keeping 18.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 11.3 cents for Interparfums.
About Interparfums
IPAR stock →Interparfums, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, markets, and distributes a range of fragrances and fragrance related products in the United States and internationally. It operates in two segments, European Based Operations and United States Based Operations.
Consumer Discretionary · Package Goods/Cosmetics · 662 employees
About Procter & Gamble
PG stock →The Procter & Gamble Company provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide. It operates through five segments: Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine & Family Care.
Consumer Discretionary · Package Goods/Cosmetics · 104,000 employees
IPAR vs PG FAQ
Which is bigger, Interparfums or Procter & Gamble?
Procter & Gamble (PG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $343.34B compared with $3.55B for Interparfums (IPAR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, IPAR or PG?
IPAR returned +18.32% over the past 12 months, compared with -3.09% for PG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, IPAR or PG?
IPAR has the lower trailing P/E at 21.2, versus 22.3 for PG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Interparfums or Procter & Gamble?
Interparfums has the higher yield at 2.88%, compared with 2.88% for Procter & Gamble.
Are Interparfums and Procter & Gamble in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Package Goods/Cosmetics industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.