Procter & Gamble (PG) vs Unilever (UL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Procter & Gamble (PG) has outperformed Unilever (UL) over the past year, losing 2.6% versus a loss of 7.4%. Over five years, PG leads with a +2.8% price change compared with +2.4% for UL. Procter & Gamble is the larger company by market cap ($343.34 billion vs $131.32 billion), about 2.6 times the size.
On valuation, Unilever trades at a lower forward P/E (15.9x vs 20.0x for Procter & Gamble). Unilever offers the higher dividend yield (3.09% vs 2.88%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PG | UL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $147.82 | $60.98 |
| Market cap | $343.34B | $131.32B |
| 1-day change | -0.40% | +0.30% |
| YTD return | +3.63% | -6.58% |
| 1-year return | -2.64% | -7.44% |
| 5-year return | +2.83% | +2.44% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 22.33 | 12.32 |
| Forward P/E | 19.99 | 15.94 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.62 | $4.95 |
| Dividend yield | 2.88% | 3.09% |
| Annual dividend | $4.26 | $1.89 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $87.03B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.26% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $16.05B | — |
| Gross margin | 50.18% | — |
| Operating margin | 22.69% | — |
| Net margin | 18.44% | — |
| 52-week high | $167.25 | $74.98 |
| 52-week low | $137.62 | $54.75 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -11.62% | -18.67% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +8.77% | +17.07% |
| Average volume | 8.60M | 3.91M |
| Shares outstanding | 2.32B | 2.15B |
| Employees | 104,000 | 93,731 |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive | Consumer Defensive |
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Procter & Gamble is about 2.6 times larger than Unilever by market value ($343.34B vs $131.32B).
- Procter & Gamble trades at a higher earnings multiple (22.3x vs 12.3x trailing P/E).
About Procter & Gamble
PG stock →The Procter & Gamble Company provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide. It operates through five segments: Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine & Family Care.
Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 104,000 employees
About Unilever
UL stock →Unilever PLC operates as a fast-moving consumer goods company in the Asia Pacific, Africa, the Americas, and Europe. It operates through four segments: Beauty & Wellbeing, Personal Care, Home Care, and Foods.
Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 93,731 employees
PG vs UL FAQ
Which is bigger, Procter & Gamble or Unilever?
Procter & Gamble (PG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $343.34B compared with $131.32B for Unilever (UL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PG or UL?
PG returned -2.64% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.44% for UL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PG or UL?
UL has the lower trailing P/E at 12.3, versus 22.3 for PG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Procter & Gamble or Unilever?
Unilever has the higher yield at 3.09%, compared with 2.88% for Procter & Gamble.
Are Procter & Gamble and Unilever in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Household & Personal Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector.