MetaCap

Coca-Cola (KO) vs Procter & Gamble (PG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Coca-Cola (KO) has outperformed Procter & Gamble (PG) over the past year, gaining 28.8% versus a loss of 2.6%. Over five years, KO leads with a +57.9% price change compared with +2.8% for PG. Coca-Cola is the larger company by market cap ($369.24 billion vs $343.34 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Procter & Gamble is growing revenue faster (+3.3% vs +1.9%).

On valuation, Procter & Gamble trades at a lower forward P/E (20.0x vs 24.3x for Coca-Cola). Procter & Gamble offers the higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 2.42%). Coca-Cola converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 27.3% versus 18.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

KO+30.17%PG-1.26%
+42%+15%-11%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
KO+58.98%PG+4.78%
+72%+28%-16%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

KO versus PG key metrics
MetricKOPG
Share price$85.82$147.82
Market cap$369.24B$343.34B
1-day change-0.41%-0.40%
YTD return+23.07%+3.63%
1-year return+28.82%-2.64%
5-year return+57.93%+2.83%
P/E ratio (TTM)25.7722.33
Forward P/E24.3519.99
EPS (TTM)$3.33$6.62
Dividend yield2.42%2.88%
Annual dividend$2.08$4.26
Revenue (latest FY)$47.94B$87.03B
Revenue growth (YoY)+1.87%+3.26%
Net income (latest FY)$13.11B$16.05B
Gross margin61.63%50.18%
Operating margin28.71%22.69%
Net margin27.34%18.44%
52-week high$92.49$167.25
52-week low$66.00$137.62
Distance from 52-week high-7.21%-11.62%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+10.03%+8.77%
Average volume15.87M8.60M
Shares outstanding4.30B2.32B
Employees65,900104,000
SectorConsumer DefensiveConsumer Defensive
IndustryBeverages - Non-AlcoholicHousehold & Personal Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • KO has outperformed PG by 31.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Coca-Cola is more profitable, keeping 27.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 18.4 cents for Procter & Gamble.

About Coca-Cola

KO stock →

The Coca-Cola Company, a beverage company, manufactures and sells various nonalcoholic beverages in the United States and internationally. The company provides Trademark Coca-Cola, sparkling soft drinks and flavors; water, sports, coffee, and tea; juice, value-added dairy, and plant-based beverages; and emerging beverages.

Consumer Defensive · Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · 65,900 employees

About Procter & Gamble

PG stock →

The Procter & Gamble Company provides branded consumer packaged goods worldwide. It operates through five segments: Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine & Family Care.

Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products · 104,000 employees

KO vs PG FAQ

Which is bigger, Coca-Cola or Procter & Gamble?

Coca-Cola (KO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $369.24B compared with $343.34B for Procter & Gamble (PG).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, KO or PG?

KO returned +28.82% over the past 12 months, compared with -2.64% for PG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, KO or PG?

PG has the lower trailing P/E at 22.3, versus 25.8 for KO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Coca-Cola or Procter & Gamble?

Procter & Gamble has the higher yield at 2.88%, compared with 2.42% for Coca-Cola.

Are Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble in the same industry?

Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector, but in different industries: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic for Coca-Cola and Household & Personal Products for Procter & Gamble.

More comparisons