MetaCap

Matson (MATX) vs Navios Maritime Partners (NMM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Matson (MATX) has outperformed Navios Maritime Partners (NMM) over the past year, gaining 131.5% versus a gain of 104.0%. Over five years, NMM leads with a +233.9% price change compared with +169.2% for MATX. Matson is the larger company by market cap ($6.81 billion vs $2.66 billion), about 2.6 times the size, while Navios Maritime Partners is growing revenue faster (+0.8% vs -2.3%).

On valuation, Navios Maritime Partners trades at a lower forward P/E (4.9x vs 13.6x for Matson). Matson offers the higher dividend yield (0.63% vs 0.24%). Navios Maritime Partners converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 21.2% versus 13.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

MATX+133.42%NMM+104.02%
+156%+70%-16%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 6, 2026
MATX+171.39%NMM+199.02%
+216%+85%-45%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

MATX versus NMM key metrics
MetricMATXNMM
Share price$227.79$91.99
Market cap$6.81B$2.66B
1-day change+2.18%+1.33%
YTD return+80.43%+74.29%
1-year return+131.48%+104.02%
5-year return+169.16%+233.87%
P/E ratio (TTM)15.326.02
Forward P/E13.554.90
EPS (TTM)$14.87$15.29
Dividend yield0.63%0.24%
Annual dividend$1.44$0.22
Revenue (latest FY)$3.34B$1.34B
Revenue growth (YoY)-2.26%+0.76%
Net income (latest FY)$444.80M$285.33M
Gross margin—90.50%
Operating margin14.94%—
Net margin13.30%21.23%
52-week high$240.87$95.00
52-week low$86.97$43.02
Distance from 52-week high-5.43%-3.17%
Analyst consensusstrong_buystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+15.79%+11.97%
Average volume290.34K149.01K
Shares outstanding29.90M28.30M
Employees4,170—
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryMarine TransportationMarine Transportation

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Matson is about 2.6 times larger than Navios Maritime Partners by market value ($6.81B vs $2.66B).
  • MATX has outperformed NMM by 27.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Matson trades at a higher earnings multiple (15.3x vs 6.0x trailing P/E).
  • Navios Maritime Partners is more profitable, keeping 21.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 13.3 cents for Matson.

About Matson

MATX stock →

Matson, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the provision of ocean transportation and logistics services. It operates through two segments, Ocean Transportation and Logistics.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 4,170 employees

About Navios Maritime Partners

NMM stock →

Navios Maritime Partners L.P. owns and operates dry cargo and tanker vessels in Asia, Europe, North America, and Australia.

Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation

MATX vs NMM FAQ

Which is bigger, Matson or Navios Maritime Partners?

Matson (MATX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.81B compared with $2.66B for Navios Maritime Partners (NMM).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, MATX or NMM?

MATX returned +131.48% over the past 12 months, compared with +104.02% for NMM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, MATX or NMM?

NMM has the lower trailing P/E at 6.0, versus 15.3 for MATX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Matson or Navios Maritime Partners?

Matson has the higher yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.24% for Navios Maritime Partners.

Are Matson and Navios Maritime Partners in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons