Golar Lng (GLNG) vs Matson (MATX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Matson (MATX) has outperformed Golar Lng (GLNG) over the past year, gaining 131.5% versus a gain of 27.3%. Over five years, GLNG leads with a +262.9% price change compared with +169.2% for MATX. Matson is the larger company by market cap ($6.67 billion vs $5.02 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Golar Lng is growing revenue faster (+51.1% vs -2.3%).
On valuation, Matson trades at a lower forward P/E (13.3x vs 78.3x for Golar Lng). Golar Lng offers the higher dividend yield (2.04% vs 0.65%). Golar Lng converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.7% versus 13.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GLNG | MATX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $49.14 | $222.92 |
| Market cap | $5.02B | $6.67B |
| 1-day change | -1.78% | -0.83% |
| YTD return | +32.06% | +80.43% |
| 1-year return | +27.27% | +131.48% |
| 5-year return | +262.92% | +169.16% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 33.66 | 15.11 |
| Forward P/E | 78.32 | 13.34 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.46 | $14.75 |
| Dividend yield | 2.04% | 0.65% |
| Annual dividend | $1.00 | $1.44 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $393.52M | $3.34B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +51.14% | -2.26% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $65.68M | $444.80M |
| Operating margin | 25.34% | 14.94% |
| Net margin | 16.69% | 13.30% |
| 52-week high | $57.79 | $240.87 |
| 52-week low | $35.02 | $86.97 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.97% | -7.45% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +34.88% | +18.32% |
| Average volume | 1.31M | 291.24K |
| Shares outstanding | 102.10M | 29.90M |
| Employees | 500 | 4,170 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Marine Transportation | Marine Transportation |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MATX has outperformed GLNG by 104.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Golar Lng trades at a higher earnings multiple (33.7x vs 15.1x trailing P/E).
- Golar Lng offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.04% vs 0.65%).
- Golar Lng grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+51.14% vs -2.26%).
About Golar Lng
GLNG stock →Golar LNG Limited designs, converts, owns, and operates marine infrastructure for the liquefaction of natural gas. The company operates in two segments, FLNG, and Corporate and Other.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 500 employees
About Matson
MATX stock →Matson, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the provision of ocean transportation and logistics services. It operates through two segments, Ocean Transportation and Logistics.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 4,170 employees
GLNG vs MATX FAQ
Which is bigger, Golar Lng or Matson?
Matson (MATX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.67B compared with $5.02B for Golar Lng (GLNG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GLNG or MATX?
MATX returned +131.48% over the past 12 months, compared with +27.27% for GLNG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GLNG or MATX?
MATX has the lower trailing P/E at 15.1, versus 33.7 for GLNG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Golar Lng or Matson?
Golar Lng has the higher yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.65% for Matson.
Are Golar Lng and Matson in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.