Matson (MATX) vs Scorpio Tankers (STNG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Matson (MATX) has outperformed Scorpio Tankers (STNG) over the past year, gaining 131.5% versus a gain of 55.5%. Over five years, STNG leads with a +408.8% price change compared with +169.2% for MATX. Matson is the larger company by market cap ($6.77 billion vs $4.42 billion), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, Matson trades at a lower forward P/E (13.5x vs 14.4x for Scorpio Tankers). Scorpio Tankers offers the higher dividend yield (1.95% vs 0.64%). Scorpio Tankers converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 36.7% versus 13.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | MATX | STNG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $226.46 | $88.21 |
| Market cap | $6.77B | $4.42B |
| 1-day change | +1.59% | +4.37% |
| YTD return | +80.43% | +66.26% |
| 1-year return | +131.48% | +55.55% |
| 5-year return | +169.16% | +408.79% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 15.23 | 5.49 |
| Forward P/E | 13.47 | 14.38 |
| EPS (TTM) | $14.87 | $16.06 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 1.95% |
| Annual dividend | $1.44 | $1.72 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.34B | $938.22M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.26% | -24.58% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $444.80M | $344.29M |
| Operating margin | 14.94% | 37.86% |
| Net margin | 13.30% | 36.70% |
| 52-week high | $240.87 | $90.06 |
| 52-week low | $86.97 | $48.93 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.98% | -2.06% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +16.47% | +10.76% |
| Average volume | 290.34K | 866.76K |
| Shares outstanding | 29.90M | 50.08M |
| Employees | 4,170 | 24 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Marine Transportation | Marine Transportation |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MATX has outperformed STNG by 75.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Matson trades at a higher earnings multiple (15.2x vs 5.5x trailing P/E).
- Scorpio Tankers offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.95% vs 0.64%).
- Scorpio Tankers is more profitable, keeping 36.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 13.3 cents for Matson.
- Matson grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (-2.26% vs -24.58%).
About Matson
MATX stock →Matson, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the provision of ocean transportation and logistics services. It operates through two segments, Ocean Transportation and Logistics.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 4,170 employees
About Scorpio Tankers
STNG stock →Scorpio Tankers Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the seaborne transportation of crude oil and refined petroleum products worldwide. As of March 19, 2026, its fleet consisted of 90 wholly owned tankers, including 34 LR2, 42MR, and 14 Handymax.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 24 employees
MATX vs STNG FAQ
Which is bigger, Matson or Scorpio Tankers?
Matson (MATX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.77B compared with $4.42B for Scorpio Tankers (STNG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, MATX or STNG?
MATX returned +131.48% over the past 12 months, compared with +55.55% for STNG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, MATX or STNG?
STNG has the lower trailing P/E at 5.5, versus 15.2 for MATX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Matson or Scorpio Tankers?
Scorpio Tankers has the higher yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.64% for Matson.
Are Matson and Scorpio Tankers in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.