PBF Energy (PBF) vs Valero Energy (VLO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
PBF Energy (PBF) has outperformed Valero Energy (VLO) over the past year, gaining 178.9% versus a gain of 159.9%. Over five years, VLO leads with a +439.2% price change compared with +433.7% for PBF. Valero Energy is the larger company by market cap ($122.11 billion vs $9.92 billion), about 12.3 times the size.
On valuation, PBF Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (4.8x vs 10.0x for Valero Energy). PBF Energy offers the higher dividend yield (1.31% vs 1.10%). Valero Energy converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 1.9% versus -0.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PBF | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $83.68 | $424.10 |
| Market cap | $9.92B | $122.11B |
| 1-day change | +0.97% | +1.16% |
| YTD return | +208.55% | +160.52% |
| 1-year return | +178.93% | +159.91% |
| 5-year return | +433.67% | +439.16% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.37 | 17.47 |
| Forward P/E | 4.80 | 10.03 |
| EPS (TTM) | $11.36 | $24.27 |
| Dividend yield | 1.31% | 1.10% |
| Annual dividend | $1.10 | $4.66 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $29.33B | $122.69B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -11.42% | -5.54% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-158.50M | $2.35B |
| Gross margin | -1.95% | 4.43% |
| Operating margin | -0.19% | 2.59% |
| Net margin | -0.54% | 1.91% |
| 52-week high | $85.75 | $428.99 |
| 52-week low | $25.62 | $155.29 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -2.41% | -1.14% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -7.98% | -11.64% |
| Average volume | 3.36M | 3.04M |
| Shares outstanding | 118.54M | 287.93M |
| Employees | 3,678 | 9,785 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Integrated oil Companies | Integrated oil Companies |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Valero Energy is about 12.3 times larger than PBF Energy by market value ($122.11B vs $9.92B).
- PBF has outperformed VLO by 19.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Valero Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.5x vs 7.4x trailing P/E).
- Valero Energy grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (-5.54% vs -11.42%).
About PBF Energy
PBF stock →PBF Energy Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the refining and supplying of petroleum products. It operates through two segments, Refining and Logistics.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 3,678 employees
About Valero Energy
VLO stock →Valero Energy Corporation manufactures, markets, and sells petroleum-based and low-carbon liquid transportation fuels and petrochemical products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Latin America, Mexico, Peru, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Refining, Renewable Diesel, and Ethanol.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 9,785 employees
PBF vs VLO FAQ
Which is bigger, PBF Energy or Valero Energy?
Valero Energy (VLO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $122.11B compared with $9.92B for PBF Energy (PBF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PBF or VLO?
PBF returned +178.93% over the past 12 months, compared with +159.91% for VLO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, PBF or VLO?
PBF has the lower trailing P/E at 7.4, versus 17.5 for VLO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBF Energy or Valero Energy?
PBF Energy has the higher yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.10% for Valero Energy.
Are PBF Energy and Valero Energy in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated oil Companies industry within the Energy sector.