MetaCap

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) vs Texas Roadhouse (TXRH)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) has outperformed Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) over the past year, gaining 5.0% versus a loss of 1.9%. Over five years, TXRH leads with a +82.6% price change compared with +15.1% for QSR. Restaurant Brands International is the larger company by market cap ($32.37 billion vs $10.68 billion), about 3.0 times the size.

On valuation, Restaurant Brands International trades at a lower forward P/E (16.0x vs 20.9x for Texas Roadhouse). Restaurant Brands International offers the higher dividend yield (3.59% vs 1.76%). Restaurant Brands International converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.4% versus 7.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

QSR+4.99%TXRH-1.87%
+31%+12%-8%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
QSR+13.55%TXRH+75.44%
+132%+51%-31%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

QSR versus TXRH key metrics
MetricQSRTXRH
Share price$70.66$162.76
Market cap$32.37B$10.68B
1-day change+1.77%+0.17%
YTD return+3.56%-1.95%
1-year return+4.99%-1.87%
5-year return+15.14%+82.61%
P/E ratio (TTM)17.7526.04
Forward P/E15.9620.95
EPS (TTM)$3.98$6.25
Dividend yield3.59%1.76%
Annual dividend$2.54$2.86
Revenue (latest FY)$9.43B$5.88B
Revenue growth (YoY)+12.23%+9.39%
Net income (latest FY)$1.07B$414.33M
Operating margin23.34%8.08%
Net margin11.39%7.05%
52-week high$81.96$216.30
52-week low$64.52$153.83
Distance from 52-week high-13.79%-24.75%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+21.65%+32.12%
Average volume2.74M983.61K
Shares outstanding348.76M65.64M
Employees53,500101,000
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurants

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Restaurant Brands International is about 3.0 times larger than Texas Roadhouse by market value ($32.37B vs $10.68B).
  • Texas Roadhouse trades at a higher earnings multiple (26.0x vs 17.8x trailing P/E).
  • Restaurant Brands International offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.59% vs 1.76%).

About Restaurant Brands International

QSR stock →

Restaurant Brands International Inc. operates as a quick service restaurant company in Canada, the United States, and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 53,500 employees

About Texas Roadhouse

TXRH stock →

Texas Roadhouse, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. It operates through Texas Roadhouse, Bubba's 33, and Others segments.

Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 101,000 employees

QSR vs TXRH FAQ

Which is bigger, Restaurant Brands International or Texas Roadhouse?

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.37B compared with $10.68B for Texas Roadhouse (TXRH).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, QSR or TXRH?

QSR returned +4.99% over the past 12 months, compared with -1.87% for TXRH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, QSR or TXRH?

QSR has the lower trailing P/E at 17.8, versus 26.0 for TXRH. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Restaurant Brands International or Texas Roadhouse?

Restaurant Brands International has the higher yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.76% for Texas Roadhouse.

Are Restaurant Brands International and Texas Roadhouse in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons