Restaurant Brands International (QSR) vs Yum China (YUMC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Restaurant Brands International (QSR) has outperformed Yum China (YUMC) over the past year, gaining 5.0% versus a loss of 1.4%. Over five years, QSR leads with a +15.1% price change compared with -31.4% for YUMC. Restaurant Brands International is the larger company by market cap ($32.37 billion vs $14.11 billion), about 2.3 times the size.
On valuation, Yum China trades at a lower forward P/E (12.4x vs 16.0x for Restaurant Brands International). Restaurant Brands International offers the higher dividend yield (3.59% vs 2.54%). Restaurant Brands International converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 11.4% versus 7.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | QSR | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $70.66 | $41.78 |
| Market cap | $32.37B | $14.11B |
| 1-day change | +1.77% | +2.78% |
| YTD return | +3.56% | -12.48% |
| 1-year return | +4.99% | -1.44% |
| 5-year return | +15.14% | -31.35% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.75 | 14.87 |
| Forward P/E | 15.96 | 12.35 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.98 | $2.81 |
| Dividend yield | 3.59% | 2.54% |
| Annual dividend | $2.54 | $1.06 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $9.43B | $11.80B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.23% | +4.37% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.07B | $929.00M |
| Operating margin | 23.34% | 10.93% |
| Net margin | 11.39% | 7.87% |
| 52-week high | $81.96 | $58.39 |
| 52-week low | $64.52 | $39.72 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -13.79% | -28.45% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +21.65% | +48.20% |
| Average volume | 2.74M | 1.52M |
| Shares outstanding | 348.76M | 337.71M |
| Employees | 53,500 | 130,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Restaurant Brands International is about 2.3 times larger than Yum China by market value ($32.37B vs $14.11B).
- Restaurant Brands International offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.59% vs 2.54%).
- Restaurant Brands International grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.23% vs +4.37%).
About Restaurant Brands International
QSR stock →Restaurant Brands International Inc. operates as a quick service restaurant company in Canada, the United States, and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 53,500 employees
About Yum China
YUMC stock →Yum China Holdings, Inc. owns, operates, and franchises restaurants in the People's Republic of China.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 130,000 employees
QSR vs YUMC FAQ
Which is bigger, Restaurant Brands International or Yum China?
Restaurant Brands International (QSR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.37B compared with $14.11B for Yum China (YUMC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, QSR or YUMC?
QSR returned +4.99% over the past 12 months, compared with -1.44% for YUMC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, QSR or YUMC?
YUMC has the lower trailing P/E at 14.9, versus 17.8 for QSR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Restaurant Brands International or Yum China?
Restaurant Brands International has the higher yield at 3.59%, compared with 2.54% for Yum China.
Are Restaurant Brands International and Yum China in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.